![Verified User in Graphic Design](/assets/icons/anonymous-avatar-purple-4ae1032bdb50ee5682003170c8184aee790d25958bd397abbd384ba52c596a7b.svg "Verified User in Graphic Design")
GG

Verified User in Graphic Design

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

8/14/2026

"Streamlined Creative Feedback with Jimo"

4/5

What do you like best about Jimo?

I’m Bo Lee, Brand Strategy Coordinator at Artisan Brand Design Co. The single best part about using Jimo is that it’s built specifically for visual design testing — something our previous tool SimpleSurvey absolutely failed at, and it perfectly fills the gaps left by our main polling tool Pinpoll. My daily job is testing logo drafts, brand color schemes, and visual concepts for client rebrands, and before Jimo, my feedback workflow was extremely messy. Last quarter, I ran a brand concept test for a boutique apparel client on SimpleSurvey, and I could only stack design images vertically. Respondents couldn’t compare versions directly, so their feedback was vague, conflicting, and nearly useless for our design team. Jimo completely fixes this with its side-by-side image layout feature. I can upload 4–6 logo variations, color palette options, or layout concepts and let viewers compare them in one single frame. This tiny feature alone has massively improved feedback accuracy. I also love its creative-focused question types like image ranking and image selection. Unlike Pinpoll, which is built for general audience polls, Jimo lets me capture both hard preference data and detailed open-ended reasoning from testers. Additionally, the private invited-only survey access is a huge win for our agency work. We handle tons of unreleased, confidential brand drafts. Just last month, I ran a pre-launch logo test for a skincare client, and Jimo’s restricted participant list prevented our WIP designs from being leaked publicly. Its simple built-in reporting also lets me filter outliers and messy responses quickly. All in all, Jimo gives me reliable, clean, design-friendly testing that our other tools cannot, making our brand feedback rounds far more efficient and precise. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Jimo?

While Jimo is hands-down the best tool we have for visual design polling, it has consistent workflow limitations that create extra manual busywork every single project. The biggest issue is its extremely limited survey page customization. When I send design surveys directly to clients for final review, I always want the survey interface to match their brand style for a polished presentation. But Jimo only lets me tweak basic font and color settings with no custom header images, branded footers, or custom layout overrides. I ran into an awkward client experience recently while testing logo iterations for a luxury skincare rebrand. The survey content featured high-end, refined design drafts, but the generic Jimo interface looked plain and unprofessional in comparison. The client even pointed out the disjointed look during our check-in, and I had to manually type long contextual notes in every section to compensate for the lack of branding customization. On top of that, Jimo’s data export system is poorly optimized for visual testing workflows, especially when I combine results with Pinpoll data. When I export CSV files after a color scheme or logo test, the uploaded image files do not carry consistent, recognizable labels into the spreadsheet. Last week, I finished a multi-version brand color test and ended up spending over an hour manually renaming rows, matching comments, and cleaning up unlabeled image data so our design team could map feedback correctly. There’s no native auto-tagging for design assets, which creates repetitive, avoidable cleanup work and slows down our weekly creative review cycles significantly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is Jimo solving and how is that benefiting you?

Before adopting Jimo and relying only on SimpleSurvey and Pinpoll for design feedback, our entire brand testing workflow was inefficient and error-prone, costing our team valuable project time. Our biggest ongoing problem was poor visual comparison layout, which ruined feedback quality on client design work. Last quarter, I conducted a logo concept survey for a local café brand using our old SimpleSurvey setup. With no side-by-side image support, respondents viewed designs one after another and mixed up their feedback. Some reviewers commented on the wrong logo version entirely, and I ended up sorting through hundreds of misleading responses that forced our designers to redo an entire round of revisions. Jimo directly solves this critical pain point by supporting clean, side-by-side visual testing for logos, color schemes, and brand mockups. It lets testers accurately compare designs, which eliminates confusing, misaligned feedback. It also solves another old problem I had: mixing internal team feedback and external audience data. Previously on Pinpoll I had to manually separate datasets in spreadsheets, but Jimo lets me run segmented survey groups natively. Even though I still manually merge Jimo and Pinpoll results after campaigns, Jimo removes the biggest workflow roadblock we faced. It delivers structured, accurate, design-specific feedback instead of messy, unreliable opinions. This saves me hours of data sorting each month and gives our creative team clear, actionable user preferences to guide brand iterations, making our entire rebrand and design testing process far more reliable and client-ready. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Show More

Validated ReviewerIncentivizedSource: G2 invite

See what 39 reviewers think of Jimo

4.6 out of 5 · Verified reviews from real users

[
Read all reviews
](https://www.g2.com/products/jimo/reviews)