Verified User in Consulting
AC
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Structured Grant Submissions with Clear Workflows and Consistent Assessment"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Good Grants?

It keeps grant submissions structured rather than spread across emails, folders and spreadsheets.

It gives a clear workflow for applications, assessment, scoring and approvals.

It reduces admin friction because applicants, assessors and administrators can all work in one system.

It supports defensible assessment by keeping criteria, scoring and reviewer comments together.

It makes grant rounds easier to track because you can see status, progress and outstanding actions.

It helps with consistency across applicants, especially where eligibility, compliance or assessment criteria matter. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Good Grants?

Rigid โ€” good for structure, but sometimes annoying when you just want to quickly handle an exception or unusual application.

Clunky for edge cases โ€” unusual grant rounds, custom assessment processes, or one-off changes may not fit neatly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Response from Lindsay Nash of Good Grants

Hi, thanks for your great review! We're so glad that you find Good Grants helpful in keeping your submissions structured, and the workflows helpful for applications, assessments, scoring and approvals! Please do reach out if we can ever help you with configuration for an edge case situation or custom process. We're always happy to help! - Lindsay

See what 90 reviewers think of Good Grants

4.5 out of 5 ยท Verified reviews from real users

Read all reviews