G2

Jonas B.

Marketing Operations & Client Partnership Manager

Marketing and Advertising

Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)

10/7/2026

"All-in-One Automation, Landing Pages, and Webinars That Streamline B2B Campaigns"

4/5

What do you like best about GetResponse?

As Jonas Bamaq, Marketing Operations & Client Partnership Manager at Alenlix Campaign Partners, our agency runs multi-channel B2B marketing campaigns for dozens of small and mid-sized business clients, and what I like best about GetResponse is its unified marketing automation builder paired with integrated email, landing page, and webinar tools within one platform. This consolidated stack eliminates the need to stitch together separate disconnected tools for each client campaign, and the visual workflow builder cuts roughly five hours of manual campaign setup work out of my weekly schedule.

Before we adopted GetResponse, we managed client email sequences on one platform, built landing pages on a separate tool, and hosted lead webinars using third-party software. Each system required manual CSV exports and imports to sync lead data, which introduced frequent data mismatches. The visual drag-and-drop automation canvas in GetResponse lets our team map end-to-end customer journeys without writing custom code. For example, for a manufacturing client’s lead nurture campaign last quarter, I built a workflow that triggers a welcome email when a prospect downloads a whitepaper on a GetResponse landing page, adds a lead score tag based on link clicks, and routes high-scoring leads directly to our client’s sales rep email alert. I built this full nurture sequence, landing page and email templates in a single afternoon, a task that previously took our team two full days across three separate tools. The workflow builder also lets us quickly copy and adapt these journey templates for new B2B clients, standardizing our campaign rollout process.

The built-in webinar module is another feature we use constantly, and it syncs attendee data automatically into the same contact database. When we host live demo webinars for our SaaS clients, registration forms embed directly on GetResponse landing pages, and attendee sign-ups populate contact profiles instantly. After the webinar ends, the platform automatically tags attendees, non-attendees, and those who stayed for more than 40% of the session, then triggers tailored follow-up email sequences for each segment. Before this integrated setup, we had to export webinar attendee lists and manually upload them into our email tool, which often created delays of 24 hours or longer before prospects received follow-up messages. This tight sync has helped our clients see faster lead engagement after online events.

One unexpected benefit we uncovered is the platform’s client-facing campaign summary reports. We can build custom dashboards that isolate email open rates, landing page conversion metrics and webinar attendance data for each individual client, then share read-only access links without giving clients full login permissions. This saves my team hours every month spent compiling separate PDF performance reports for each stakeholder. Instead of manually gathering metrics across three platforms, we share a live GetResponse dashboard link that clients can review anytime.

Our agency only has limited shared IT support, so GetResponse’s native CRM and Zapier integrations are reliable enough for us to connect campaign lead data to our main project management system without complex custom development. This all-in-one marketing stack reduces tool overhead, unifies lead data, and lets our marketing operations team focus on refining campaign strategy instead of managing messy cross-platform data transfers. While we still rely on external tools for advanced paid ad tracking, GetResponse’s combined automation, landing page and webinar functionality streamlines our core B2B campaign delivery and consistently helps us hit tight client launch deadlines. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about GetResponse?

As Jonas Bamaq, Marketing Operations & Client Partnership Manager at Alenlix Campaign Partners, the biggest pain point with GetResponse for our agency model is its flawed contact counting logic paired with limited native sub-account controls for managing multiple B2B clients. GetResponse counts a single lead as multiple billable contacts if that prospect appears on more than one client list inside our main account. This creates unpredictable monthly billing spikes, and we cannot fully isolate client assets, workflows, and contact data in separate secure workspaces without purchasing separate full platform subscriptions for every client project.

For example, last quarter we ran two linked lead-generation campaigns for complementary SaaS clients. A prospect downloaded whitepapers from both client landing pages, so their single email address existed on two separate contact lists within our GetResponse account. The platform counted this one prospect as two contacts, pushing our total contact volume over our plan tier threshold and triggering an unexpected monthly price increase. Our limited shared IT support team had no bandwidth to build complex API scripts to deduplicate contacts across lists. We spent nearly three hours manually auditing and merging duplicate contacts to bring our billing back down, time that should have been allocated to finalizing campaign launch assets for our clients. We also cannot fully restrict client-side team members to view only their own campaign data; if we grant a stakeholder login access, they can navigate across our other client contact lists, which creates data privacy risks for our B2B accounts.

A second major limitation is the rigid custom reporting engine, which cannot combine cross-channel marketing metrics into the tailored client performance dashboards our agency delivers. We regularly need to pull unified reports showing email engagement, landing page conversion rates, webinar attendance, and lead scoring progress for each client. GetResponse reports these metrics in isolated modules, and there is no way to build a persistent saved report that merges all these data points in one view. For our manufacturing client’s quarterly marketing review last month, I exported four separate CSV files, then manually combined and formatted the data in Google Sheets to build the client presentation deck. This manual compilation work added roughly two hours of admin labor per client report, and the static exported spreadsheets cannot refresh automatically for ongoing live tracking.

The webinar recording storage cap is another recurring frustration. Our B2B clients often host 60-minute thought leadership webinars, and our plan only retains recordings for a limited number of hours. When a client requested access to replays of three webinars spanning a two-month campaign, we discovered that the oldest recording had been auto-deleted by the platform. We had to manually download and archive every webinar file immediately after each live session, adding another mandatory step to our campaign checklist.

One unexpected downside we discovered after rolling out GetResponse across our client portfolio is the weak native integration with our main CRM platform. The sync only pushes basic contact names and email addresses, and it fails to transfer lead score values or webinar engagement tags into our CRM. We have to rely on clunky Zapier triggers to pass this enriched lead data, and the sync frequently drops tags during high-volume lead import windows. This means our sales teams receive incomplete lead context, reducing the quality of client follow-up. While GetResponse’s all-in-one automation and landing page tools work well for individual campaign builds, its contact billing rules, poor client workspace isolation, limited reporting and unreliable CRM sync create consistent operational friction for our agency managing dozens of separate B2B marketing accounts. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is GetResponse solving and how is that benefiting you?

As Jonas Bamaq, Marketing Operations & Client Partnership Manager at Alenlix Campaign Partners, our agency adopted GetResponse to solve three critical workflow pain points: disjointed multi-tool campaign stacks, delayed lead follow-up after gated content and webinars, and repetitive rebuild work for every new B2B client marketing program. Our agency has 51–200 team members with only limited shared IT support, so juggling multiple disconnected SaaS tools previously ate up large chunks of our campaign build time and created frequent lead data sync errors.

The primary problem GetResponse addresses is our reliance on separate platforms for email nurture sequences, landing pages, and webinar hosting. Before adopting this tool, we built landing pages on one service, created email automations on a second platform, and ran webinars on a third. Every campaign required manual CSV exports and imports to pass prospect data between tools, which often created 24-hour delays before leads received follow-up communications. GetResponse’s visual drag-and-drop automation workflow builder unifies landing pages, email campaigns, and webinar registration in one single workspace, cutting our campaign setup time by roughly five hours per client project. Last quarter, we built a full lead nurture funnel for a B2B manufacturing client: a whitepaper landing page, behavior-triggered email sequence, and post-webinar lead segmentation, all within GetResponse. Instead of coordinating three separate logins and manual data transfers, we cloned our saved workflow template and fully launched the campaign in a single afternoon. This directly helps us hit tight client launch deadlines and reduces human error during lead data handoffs.

Second, GetResponse solves the challenge of manual post-event lead segmentation. When we run B2B thought leadership webinars for our clients, the platform automatically tags attendees, absentees, and prospects who stayed for most of the session. These tags feed directly into pre-built automation rules that send tailored follow-up emails to each audience segment. Previously, we exported attendee spreadsheets after every webinar, cleaned up contact lists manually, and uploaded them into our email tool, which meant hot prospects waited a full day or longer to receive our client’s follow-up message. With GetResponse, the tagging and email triggers activate instantly once the webinar ends. For a SaaS client’s product demo webinar in spring, the automated follow-up workflow sent customized messages to over 180 attendees within minutes, and the client reported a 28% jump in booked sales calls compared to our older multi-tool setup.

One unexpected benefit we uncovered is the platform’s reusable campaign template library. We save approved landing page designs, email templates, and automation journeys inside GetResponse, so our creative team can reuse these assets for new clients without rebuilding everything from scratch. This standardizes our deliverable quality and cuts creative review cycles, so our freelance designers can spend more time refining custom brand assets instead of rebuilding basic funnel frameworks.

GetResponse also connects with our CRM via Zapier to pass lead score and engagement data, bridging gaps between marketing activity and sales pipelines. While it still has limitations with contact billing and cross-client reporting, it eliminates the costly overhead of managing multiple separate marketing subscriptions and removes the tedious manual data migration work that bogged down our marketing operations team. This consolidated platform lets us focus our effort on strategy and client results rather than fixing broken cross-tool data syncs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.