Pratik S.
PS
Senior QA Engineer
Information Technology and Services
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Saves me hours on QA work, just double check it"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Gemini?

I work as a QA engineer and Gemini has become part of my daily routine. What I like most is handing it a user story or a set of acceptance criteria and getting back a decent list of test scenarios, including the negative and edge cases. It usually catches a boundary case or two that I'd have missed on my first pass. It's also pretty good with automation code. When a test fails with a long stack trace, I paste in the error along with the test and it normally points me in the right direction, like a selector that changed or a wait that's too short. Responses are quick, and because we already use Google Workspace, pulling in a requirements doc from Drive or exporting a table of test cases to Sheets is really convenient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Gemini?

It can be confidently wrong, which is a real risk in testing. A few times it gave me automation code that used a method that doesn't exist in the version we're on, or assumed a field would behave a certain way when it didn't. So I always double check before I use anything it gives me. In long conversations it also starts to lose track of details I mentioned earlier, like the exact validation rules for a form, and I end up repeating myself or starting a new chat. The answers can be a bit generic too unless I give it a lot of context upfront. It would be great if it held on to project context better between chats. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

See what 875 reviewers think of Gemini

4.4 out of 5 · Verified reviews from real users

Read all reviews