G2

Damian H.

CEO

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

7/15/2026

"Waterfall enrichment that fills the gaps Hunter and Apollo miss"

4.5/5

What do you like best about FullEnrich?

I run B2B prospecting daily on Hunter and Apollo, and I added FullEnrich as a third waterfall layer. It consistently pulls emails and mobile numbers the other two miss, so contactability of my lists went up, not just record count. The pay-for-results model keeps costs predictable, since I pay for a hit and not for every lookup. The 15+ source waterfall genuinely matters on harder segments. As a side effect it surfaced companies I did not have on my radar during discovery. Clean interface, fast to set up, and the integrations slot into my existing stack without friction. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about FullEnrich?

The company list does not include a direct website URL column, so I cannot pull the company's website straight into the export. That slows down the workflow, because I have to look those links up separately. It is also not available as a filter, which would be useful when I want to segment by companies that have a site. Adding a website column and matching filter would remove that friction. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is FullEnrich solving and how is that benefiting you?

FullEnrich closes the data gaps in my B2B prospecting, mainly missing emails to decision makers. I run Hunter and Apollo daily, and I added FullEnrich as a third waterfall layer. I struggled to reach contactability on harder segments, but now the 15+ source waterfall fills in emails the other two miss, which lifts the deliverability and hit rate of my cold outreach. During discovery it also surfaced companies I did not previously have on my radar, so it doubles as a way to expand my target list. I treat it as a complement to Hunter and Apollo, not a replacement, and in that setup it measurably improves list quality. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.