Derek O.
DO
Corporate Technical Content & Instructional Visual Designer
Information Technology and Services
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Fast, Reliable Spaces + CDN for Sharing Technical Visual Assets"
4.5/5
What do you like best about DigitalOcean?

I’m Derek Ortiz, Corporate Technical Content & Instructional Visual Designer at Austin Industrial Tech Documentation Group, a 92-person enterprise industrial software firm in Austin, Texas. I create technical diagrams, hardware illustrations and instructional visuals using SaviDraw. I use DigitalOcean alongside our Confluence knowledge base, internal DAM and Microsoft 365, managing graphic asset archives, version trails and CCPA compliance for customer-identifiable visual assets during high-volume documentation release sprints.

What I like best about DigitalOcean is its Spaces object storage paired with built-in CDN and simple one-click Droplet deployment, which gives our content team a fast, reliable place to host preview versions of technical diagrams, SVG schematics and draft documentation assets. The straightforward control panel and file upload workflow saves me roughly three hours every week that I previously spent manually uploading large batches of visual assets to our old on-prem server and troubleshooting slow preview load times for our engineering and sales teams.

I rely heavily on DigitalOcean Spaces and CDN delivery for my day-to-day visual design work. When I finish drafting hardware component illustrations or workflow schematics in SaviDraw, I export SVG and PNG files and upload them directly into Spaces buckets. I set bucket permissions to create temporary preview links for our technical writers and product engineers to review assets before final publication to Confluence or our DAM. During our last industrial software documentation sprint, I created a dedicated Spaces bucket for a new hardware integration manual, and generated time-limited share links for 72 draft diagrams. Engineers could quickly view high-resolution schematics without downloading heavy files locally, and I could revoke access instantly once review wrapped up. The CDN caches these visual assets globally, so remote sales team members pull preview images quickly even from our regional client sites. The simple UI also makes it easy to organize folders by release version, which helps me maintain edit trails for CCPA compliance on any customer-identifiable visuals embedded in illustrations.

An unexpected benefit I’ve discovered is the clean, readable public documentation and community tutorial library. I originally signed up for DigitalOcean only to host static graphic assets and draft documentation previews, but their extensive technical guides became a handy reference when I build infrastructure workflow diagrams for our product help center. When I was drafting a schematic showing our backend data pipeline last quarter, I used DigitalOcean’s own architecture documentation to validate component labels and workflow logic, which reduced revision rounds with our engineering team. That library was a nice bonus that improved the accuracy of my technical visuals without extra tooling.

For integrations, DigitalOcean’s API works reliably with Zapier to sync new asset upload notifications to our team’s Microsoft Teams channel, so writers get alerts when new diagram drafts are ready for review.

Suggestions: I would love built-in visual asset versioning within Spaces to track SVG/PNG revisions natively, instead of me manually naming and archiving every iteration. Adding native integration with our DAM platform would remove manual file transfers between systems. More granular bucket access expiry controls would streamline compliance work for CCPA, making it simpler to auto-expire links containing customer identifiable visual data. Overall, DigitalOcean’s simple object storage and CDN tools streamline our technical visual review workflow and make sharing large diagram sets with cross-functional teams much easier during tight documentation release cycles. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about DigitalOcean?

I’m Derek Ortiz, Corporate Technical Content & Instructional Visual Designer at Austin Industrial Tech Documentation Group, a 92-person enterprise industrial software firm in Austin, Texas. I build hardware diagrams, workflow schematics and instructional visuals using SaviDraw. Our team hosts our Confluence knowledge base, DAM asset library and documentation preview environments on DigitalOcean droplets. I manage visual asset version trails and archive customer-identifiable graphics to meet CCPA privacy rules, and I test documentation previews during high-volume release sprints.

The biggest frustration I run into with DigitalOcean is the limited native file versioning and snapshot granularity for our static design asset storage. When I upload exported SVG and PNG technical diagrams to our DAM hosted on DigitalOcean droplets, snapshots only capture full server states, not individual asset file revisions. If I overwrite a SaviDraw-generated workflow schematic and need to revert only that single graphic, I cannot restore just one file. I have to roll back the entire droplet snapshot, which reverts every other team member’s documentation edits on the server. During our last major industrial software release sprint, I accidentally uploaded a mislabeled hardware component diagram and needed to revert it. Rolling back the snapshot erased three other writers’ Confluence page updates, forcing our team to manually recreate that work and pushing our documentation deadline back by half a day. This creates risky, disruptive workflow breaks for our content team.

A second key pain point is inconsistent file upload throughput and slow asset preview rendering when handling high-resolution vector exports. I frequently upload batches of layered PNG and SVG instructional visuals from SaviDraw to our DAM hosted on DigitalOcean. When I push 20+ large diagram files at once during release crunch periods, uploads stall intermittently, and web-based previews of vector graphics lag heavily. Last month, I spent nearly two hours re-trying batch uploads for a set of machine hardware schematics. The slow preview speeds also make it hard for our sales enablement team to quickly review draft visuals hosted on the droplet for feedback. This eats into my diagram drafting time and delays content reviews.

DigitalOcean also lacks simple built-in audit trails for file access to support our CCPA compliance work. I need to track who accesses customer-identifiable visual assets embedded in our technical illustrations, but DigitalOcean does not log file-level reads and downloads natively. I have to add extra third-party logging tools on top of the droplet to capture this activity, which adds setup overhead and maintenance work. There is also no native direct integration with Confluence or our DAM; I rely on manual file transfers or custom scripts to move SaviDraw exports onto the server, which introduces extra room for human error.

Suggestions: I’d like DigitalOcean to add file-level versioning alongside full droplet snapshots, so I can revert individual assets without rolling back the whole server. Improve batch upload stability and vector graphic preview rendering for large batches of SVG/PNG design assets. Build native file-access audit logs for compliance tracking, to simplify CCPA reporting for teams storing customer-related visual content. Native integrations with Confluence and DAM platforms would remove custom scripting work when moving design assets to documentation environments. While DigitalOcean droplets are reliable for hosting our documentation stack, these limitations create extra manual work and release risk for technical content teams managing large libraries of visual instructional assets. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

See what 745 reviewers think of DigitalOcean

4.6 out of 5 · Verified reviews from real users

Read all reviews