What do you dislike about Calendly?
While Calendly is an industry standard for individual and basic team scheduling, several functional gaps, rigid defaults, and missing features frequently create friction in complex or non-standard workflows. For individuals managing multiple roles or consulting for different clients, Calendly only allows you to select a single account to send outbound meeting invites from, which causes confusion when the meeting needs to originate from a specific client's email domain. Invitees cannot book recurring sessions in one go, adding friction for long-term engagements. Calendly displays all available slots based on static rules, leading to fragmented days, unlike competitors offering a 'Minimize Gaps' feature. Coordinating meetings with multiple stakeholders can be clunky compared to tools like Doodle. You can't easily override a busy slot for urgent bookings without adjusting global settings. Lastly, the free plan is restrictive, allowing only one active event type at a time, forcing users to either repeatedly edit a single event or upgrade. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
Recommendations to others considering Calendly:
To enhance user experience, Calendly could consider adding features like multi-account management for sending invites, a 'Minimize Gaps' option for scheduling, and the ability to book recurring sessions in one go. Improving the flexibility of the free plan and allowing overrides for urgent bookings without global setting changes would also be beneficial. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.
What problems is Calendly solving and how is that benefiting you?
Calendly removes scheduling friction and eliminates back-and-forth emails. It syncs events automatically, manages workflow with API integrations, and optimizes booking with buffer times and daily caps. It's easy to use, with features like timezone translation and no account requirement for invitees. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.