Sebastian T.
ST
Senior Client Strategy & Operations Lead
Management Consulting
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Guest users or non-business users of the software, not included in G2 scores.
"All-in-One Project Tracking, Time Tracking, and Invoicing That Saves Hours Weekly"
4.5/5
What do you like best about Avaza?

As Senior Client Strategy & Operations Lead at Pineview Strategy Advisors, I lead client strategy engagements, oversee consulting project delivery, manage contract consultants, and test SaaS tools for our boutique management consulting firm. Our lean team of 11 to 50 people has no dedicated IT staff, so we rely on platforms that can combine project tracking, timesheet capture, and client billing in one single workspace. What I value most about Avaza is its unified project management, time tracking and invoicing ecosystem. The built-in time entry timer linked directly to project tasks saves me roughly six hours each week that I previously spent reconciling separate timesheet spreadsheets and cross-checking billable hours against project milestones.

We deploy Avaza for our end-to-end consulting engagements, from client kickoff workshops through final strategy report delivery. Every client project gets its own workspace, with task lists broken down by workstream: stakeholder interviews, market research analysis, financial modeling, and strategy deck development. Our contract consultants log time against individual task items inside Avaza, and all time entries attach automatically to the corresponding project budget. During a recent business transformation project for a mid-market manufacturing client, we split the project across three external contract consultants. Each consultant logged hours directly against assigned tasks, and I could instantly view real-time burn rate against our agreed project budget. This eliminated the old workflow where consultants submitted weekly Excel timesheets that I had to manually compile and validate.

Another feature our team uses constantly is Avaza’s custom invoice generator, which pulls approved billable time directly from project logs. Once we approve a consultant’s time entries, I can generate a detailed client invoice with line items mapped to each workstream in just a few clicks. The invoice can be sent out from the platform, and payment status tracking stays linked to the original project. This tight connection between time tracking and billing removes the manual data transfer between our project tracker and invoicing tool that used to introduce human error.

An unexpected benefit we discovered is Avaza’s client portal for sharing deliverables and collecting feedback. We can grant controlled guest access to our clients, so they can view approved project milestones, download strategy reports, and leave comments without gaining full access to our internal task lists, consultant rate data, or sensitive internal notes. For that manufacturing transformation project, we uploaded draft strategy decks to the client portal. The client left feedback directly on the files inside Avaza, so all comments were tied to the project record instead of scattered across long email threads. This kept all stakeholder feedback centralized and created a clear audit trail of client approvals.

Avaza consolidates project planning, consultant time tracking, budget oversight, invoicing and client document sharing into one platform. It removes the need to juggle multiple disconnected SaaS tools for our consulting delivery work. For our lean consulting team without IT support, this unified workspace keeps our client transformation projects on budget, streamlines billing operations, and creates a single source of truth for all project documentation and stakeholder feedback. Our team spends far less time on administrative reconciliation work and can focus more of our energy on developing actionable strategy recommendations for our mid-market clients. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Avaza?

As Senior Client Strategy & Operations Lead at Pineview Strategy Advisors, we rely on Avaza to manage consulting project delivery, track contract consultant time entries, and share strategy deliverables with mid-market clients. While its unified time tracking and invoicing tools serve our core operational needs, the platform has notable limitations that create bottlenecks for our complex strategy engagements, especially around advanced workflow automation, subtask governance, and native integration with our business intelligence tools. Our lean team has no dedicated IT staff, so these gaps force us to build manual workarounds that eat into time reserved for client strategy analysis.

The most frustrating weakness is Avaza’s limited subtask functionality. When we break down large transformation projects into workstreams such as stakeholder interviews, financial modelling, and presentation development, we need independent deadlines, assignees and budget tracking for each subtask. Avaza’s subtasks inherit the parent task’s due date and assigned team member; we cannot set separate deadlines or assign our contract consultants to individual subtasks. During a recent supply chain strategy project for a manufacturing client, we split a market research workstream into four separate research activities. Since each subtask could not have its own deadline, I had to create four standalone parent tasks instead. This cluttered the project dashboard, made it harder to visualize the full workstream, and added nearly two hours of manual task setup time for that project alone.

Avaza also lacks robust custom workflow automation rules. We wanted to set up triggers that automatically flag a project when billable hours hit 80% of the total budget and send an alert to the client lead. The platform only supports very basic automation for task assignment and invoice reminders, with no conditional logic for budget threshold alerts. Without this automatic warning system, we have to manually check project burn rates every few days. On one consulting project, we only discovered we were approaching budget limits during a weekly manual review, leaving little room to adjust the scope before exceeding our agreed project budget.

Another pain point is the shallow native integration with BI tools and cloud storage platforms we use daily. We store large strategy decks, financial models and interview transcripts in Google Drive, but Avaza does not support deep file linking or embedded previews. When uploading deliverables to the client portal, we must upload copies directly into Avaza rather than linking to our master files in Drive. This creates duplicate document versions, and we have run into cases where a consultant updated the master strategy deck in Drive but forgot to re-upload the revised file into Avaza’s client portal, causing confusion for our client stakeholders.

An unexpected downside we found is that Avaza does not support offline access. When our consultants travel to client sites with unstable internet connections, they cannot log time, update task progress or review project notes. During an on-site client workshop, one of our contract consultants lost internet access mid-day and could not log their time entries until returning to the office, which led to forgotten time entries and incomplete project records.

Avaza works well for simple consulting projects with straightforward task structures, but its rigid subtask design, limited automation, weak third-party integrations and lack of offline capabilities create friction for our multi-workstream strategy projects. For our lean consulting team without IT support, these shortcomings add repetitive manual administrative work and introduce risks of version control errors and missed budget alerts on client engagements. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

See what 375 reviewers think of Avaza

4.5 out of 5 · Verified reviews from real users

Read all reviews