Project Resource Scheduling is where Avaza earns its place in our delivery process. Before committing to a new project, we can see who actually has capacity, how much of the week is already reserved, and which recurring responsibilities are quietly consuming time outside the new estimate. Recurring Schedule Bookings have made that view much more realistic for production support, architecture reviews, on-call coverage, and maintenance that repeats every week or month. We can update a single occurrence, the remaining bookings, or the entire series, and Avaza shows how many reservations will change before we confirm anything. That detail matters because technical capacity is rarely as simple as checking whether someone has another large feature assigned. A senior engineer may look free in the backlog while two mornings are already blocked for support, another client expects a weekly architecture session, and several pull requests still need review. Once those commitments are visible in Team Schedule, capacity planning stops depending on who remembers the most context or happens to be online when the conversation starts. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The mobile experience is useful for checking a task, approving something, or logging time quickly, but I would not use it to rebalance capacity or review a project with a large task structure. Some parts of the interface also feel older than the rest of the product, and specific settings are not always where I expect them to be. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.