Cryptomator fits cleanly into an existing cloud storage setup because it does not try to replace the provider or the sync client. I can keep using the same Dropbox or Google Drive folder structure and simply place a vault inside it, which keeps the deployment lightweight and easy to explain. The vault concept maps well to how I already work with project folders. After creating a vault, unlocking it exposes a normal looking drive view where I can open, edit, and save files using standard applications. In the background, the cloud synced location only contains encrypted data, so the provider never sees readable content. Filename protection is handled in a way that feels intentional rather than optional. It is not only the file bytes that are encrypted, but also names and folder structure details, which matters when filenames contain client names, project codes, or other sensitive descriptors. This reduces the amount of metadata that leaks just by syncing a folder. The day to day UX stays focused. Creating a vault, choosing its location, unlocking it, and locking it again are the main operations, and the UI does not bury those actions behind extra file management features. That focus makes it easier to roll out to people who just need “a safe folder in the cloud” without learning a new storage product. Cross platform availability was important in my case, and Cryptomator covered the bases I needed. I used it on desktop and Android, and the same vault remained usable across devices as long as the underlying encrypted folder stayed in sync. That consistency removes a lot of friction compared with solutions that use platform specific formats. The approach also plays nicely with compliance minded storage practices. Because encryption happens locally before sync, it becomes simpler to justify using a cloud provider for transport and availability while still keeping control over confidentiality. When combined with a provider that supports the right contractual and administrative controls, the overall pattern is much easier to defend internally. Desktop pricing and distribution are straightforward for evaluation and gradual adoption. In practice that meant I could validate the workflow, document best practices, and then decide how to support the project going forward without blocking on licensing discussions on day one.

Cryptomator replaced Boxcryptor for my business. Not only is the interface cleaner and easier to use, but it is open source and free to use. Most importantly, it works perfectly with both Google Drive and Microsoft OneDrive, both of which we use with our clients. I have discovered that it also works with Icedrive and pCloud which is an advantage if you don't want to pay the extra fee for encryption with pCloud.

Cryptomator is not capable to provide a desktop version thats free whichs a big advantage. It is not able to ensures storage of files by requiring intervention, for unlocking and locking the vault. The user interface is complex to use.