I started using it when I needed a quick answer I could actually check. What stuck with me is that it does not just give a conclusion, it shows where it came from, so I can open the source and see how strong the evidence is before I act on it. That changed how I use it. I spend less time wondering whether I missed a newer guideline, and more time reading the actual paper or guideline behind the point. The traceability is the reason I keep coming back.

User Interface / User Experience: Web and mobile interface offers a simple, conversational and non-distracting design tailored to clinicians with the purpose to make it easy to ask fast questions in patient evaluations. Integration: Easy connection between the searches for clinical information and key medical literature databases and publisher systems, which helps users avoid jumping from one tab to another in their browsers. Speed: Provides concise and structured answers and medical syntheses within seconds, hence significantly increasing the speed of evidence-based studies. Price / Return on Investment: Free to use by healthcare professionals, providing them an unparalleled return on investment by saving tons of time on weekly literature reviews. Onboarding / Support: Simple onboarding process based on credential verification for clinicians to be able to start using the platform instantly. AI/ Intelligence: State-of-the-art medical intelligence powered by collaborations with leading scientific journals (such as NEJM, JAMA, and Lancet portfolios), which helps to analyze complex results and provides sources of each claim.

My provider uses open evidence to look up certain diagnoses to confirm if it’s what her patient has. It also gives research based answers which is nice especially when it comes to treating patients that may not be responding to the traditional treatment plans