Hands down, what I like best about n8n is its UI and UX. The ability to see the connections between the different nodes, how the input becomes the output, and where your flow breaks, makes it much easier to resolve issues, both when you're reviewing the build portion and also looking at a process that has run through it.

I like that it gave me full control over the objects on the page and I was able to create exactly what I wanted and not be bound by the limitations of other systems like Make or Manus

I've been using n8n for a few months now, and overall I'm really impressed with it. What I like most is the balance between simplicity and flexibility. You can build basic workflows in minutes using the visual editor, but if you need more advanced logic, it's easy to drop into JavaScript and customize things exactly the way you want. Compared to some other automation platforms I've used, n8n feels much less restrictive. Being able to self-host it was a big plus for me because it gives more control over data and avoids some of the limitations and pricing models of cloud-only solutions. The number of integrations is already quite good, and when a connector doesn't exist, the HTTP Request node usually makes it possible to connect to almost any API. I've used it for IT operations, notifications, data synchronization, and a few AI-related workflows without running into major issues. That said, it's not perfect. Some workflows can become harder to maintain as they grow larger, and occasionally I've had to spend time debugging expressions or node configurations. The documentation is generally helpful, but there were a few situations where I had to search community forums to find the answer. Overall, n8n has become one of my favorite automation tools. It's powerful enough for complex use cases while still being approachable for people who aren't full-time developers. If you want a workflow automation platform that gives you a lot of freedom without locking you into a specific ecosystem, it's definitely worth trying.