Saves me time and gives me accuracy in minutes.

It can handle complex, multi-part projects effortlessly. A student can submit a mix of PDFs, Word documents, PowerPoints, and code files, and the AI will analyze and cross-reference all of them simultaneously in a single workflow.

What I like most is how fast it gets you from a blank assignment to a usable rubric. I set the assignment type and subject, and it auto-generated a full weighted grading profile - four dimensions with clear descriptions and weights totaling 100%, which I could re-balance right there with sliders instead of building a rubric by hand. That alone saved me the tedious part of grading setup. The AI output is the real differentiator, though. Every dimension score comes with an evidence-cited justification rather than a bare number, so a grade is something you can actually defend to a student. I also like the transparency of the grading run - it walks through a visible multi-step pipeline (understanding the rubric, then evaluating), so it doesn't feel like a black box. Toggles like Require Citations and Factual Verification let me tighten the rubric for exam-style work. Two smaller things I didn't expect to value: import/export of rubrics as Markdown (easy to version-control or reuse), and a Profile Library for saving grading profiles. And the consistency focus is the selling point that holds up - running the same submission gives you a reproducible result instead of a different grade every time, which is the whole reason to use a purpose-built tool over pasting into ChatGPT.