Tablefold pulls one printed table out of a report PDF into an editable Excel sheet, with the source page shown beside it so every cell can be checked against where it came from. Upload a text-based PDF, pick the page and table you need, review the extracted grid next to the page, and download the sheet. It is built for analysts and operations teams who have a clearly identified printed table that needs to become sortable, totalable data. Notes flag empty columns, missing headers, ragged rows, and uncertain cells; scanned PDFs without a text layer are refused rather than guessed at. Whole multi-page reports are not converted in one pass; work one table at a time.

Upload a source, name Excel, Word, a searchable scan, or another format, then inspect tables, headings, and page order beside the output. It is for people who have a document in the wrong format and need an editable, searchable, or structured file they can inspect against the source before using it. You get a downloadable converted file in the requested supported format, a structure record covering pages, headings, tables, text blocks, or cells relevant to that format, and a quality report that names passed checks, visible differences, and unresolved review items. When the source is unsupported, corrupt, or encrypted, or the output check fails, it returns a clear failure instead of a finished result. Complex layouts and scanned pages may still need manual correction, and users review extracted facts and final formatting.

Instead of a loose pile of citations, build evidence records that show the source, excerpt, claim link, and review decision. Conflicting findings sit side by side. It is for researchers and evidence-synthesis teams with a defined question, an inclusion scope, and a set of papers that need to become a reviewable evidence record. You get a source register that keeps each paper and excerpt identifiable, a passage-level evidence table with page locations for source checking, claim relationships marked as supporting, challenging, or still unclear, and a conflict and gap list that names what still needs researcher verification.

Index the materials once, then examine ownership, obligations, gaps, and inconsistencies without blending fact with judgment. The result is a sourced question list for accountable professional review. It is for legal, investment, finance, and advisory teams that already have a defined diligence scope and document set but need a faster, traceable first review before accountable professionals make judgments. You get a document index showing which supplied materials were reviewed, a fact register with a document and location beside each extracted fact, a risk and inconsistency list that separates source evidence from reviewer judgment, and a missing-materials list and sourced questions for professional follow-up.