Nothing it doesn’t work Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I'm really disappointed with UX Pilot AI. It didn't solve my problem at all. I paid for 1,200 credits, expecting to get 1,200 screen creations, but I only got seven to ten screens, and they were unusable. I feel like I wasted $30. The redesign feature doesn't work very well either; it just goes off on a tangent and redesigns the whole project, not just the UX aspects I asked for. The setup experience was bad too because its functionality is limited to the website and doesn't work on the desktop app. Even after upgrading, the desktop version still shows zero credits and keeps asking me to add more. It's been a painful experience overall. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As a UX Designer, UXPilot has transformed my early-stage workflow. In just seconds it generates first proposals that are visually coherent and surprisingly accurate — output quality I didn't expect from an AI tool. Less time on blank-canvas paralysis, more time on real UX decisions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

When requesting corrections to an existing design, the tool applies changes selectively — some are reflected, others are ignored — yet credits are consumed regardless. This forces you to re-prompt for the same adjustments, which adds unnecessary friction and credit waste to the iteration cycle. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I’d have to say the best feature I’ve found so far is its integration with Figma. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The manual editing feels a bit wonky right now. I’ve only just started using it, so I’m guessing it’s something that will get easier and feel more natural as I use it more. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate the clear structure of UX Pilot AI and find it great that it is faster than other AIs, which often ask too many questions and take too long to think. The rapid prototyping capability is extremely helpful, as results can be tested more quickly. Additionally, the initial setup was very easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find UX Pilot AI somewhat expensive and think the editing function could be improved. Unlike Figma, I can't edit elements or components directly, which means I have to go through the system or a design system, and that can be cumbersome. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find UX Pilot AI to be super fast and it's really good at producing high-quality designs. Unlike other AI models I've tried, this one is visually something I can actually use. I also appreciate how easily I can prompt ideas with it. The outcome is always useful for my work and perfect for iteration. It's invaluable for quickly generating early ideas, allowing me to bypass the slower traditional processes of creating wireframes, conducting research, and making mind maps. I can simply describe the concept and feed in some project information, and UX Pilot AI helps solve the initial ideas so I can proceed in my usual manner. Additionally, the initial setup was super easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I don't like when UX Pilot AI starts creating designs in the wrong direction, and it takes credits from my account even though I want to stop it. It's frustrating because it's bugging a lot. When I prompt the design, sometimes the frames just disappear, and I need to find them in a draft and send them back. The prompts aren't saved, and I want the AI to remember what I prompted before. The page also stops working sometimes, which is annoying. Other than that, it's super good. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about UX Pilot AI is its ability to generate high-quality, polished designs that look much cleaner than other AI tools. I also appreciate the level of detail I can get into when editing, and the fact that it integrates design system elements directly into the workflow is a huge game-changer. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

"I find the manual process of adding individual components to the design system a bit inefficient. It would be much better if there was an option to bulk-import an entire file or library at once to speed up the setup process. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that UX Pilot AI dramatically decreases the time required to produce an accurate representation of my concepts compared to manual creation. It is equally adept at creating a remarkably accurate representation of my concepts when I provide a detailed description or when I start with a general prompt and iterate with follow-up prompts until I achieve an accurate mockup. It effectively extends general concepts with logical and meaningful extensions and applies a layout and presentation that makes sense. The initial setup was quite easy, especially after some research through YouTube videos and chat discussions. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I sometimes have a hard time deciding when it would be best to rely on the standard model vs. applying deep or max modes. It would be nice if it could provide recommendations based on the prompt to increase the likelihood of getting good results without re-working later. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find UX Pilot AI really enhances the speed to concept, which used to take weeks, but now, once set up, generates concepts very quickly. I also like the style guide feature, which is really valuable when managing multiple clients at the same time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While the Figma integration is great both on Fig Jam and Design boards, it's a very clunky integration to use. When uploading web page designs, it's difficult to tell which thumbnails to choose to get the right file. The files sometimes don't upload to Figma and it takes multiple attempts to upload UX Pilot AI files to Figma. This can be very frustrating and time-wasting. It would be good to have version control on each project. UX Pilot AI struggles with having too many designs in one project, which can be annoying because there is no way to have continuity between projects. I haven't found a way to carry over designs between projects other than by using screenshots for reference. There is quite a learning curve to figure out how to use the tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I really like that UX Pilot AI allows us to get wireframes and full high-resolution designs, which can export easily to Figma. This feature makes it super convenient to share designs with clients for feedback and with developers to build the final applications. Also, it's simple to set up and use, which is a big plus for me. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I do feel slightly limited on the number of projects that you can have. I have a paid plan and am limited to 5 projects at a time. It recommends adding a new project if you exceed too many designs. I would have to upgrade to a higher plan in order to get more projects. When I create a new project it would be great to chat with AI to discuss the project, branding, etc before designing so that everything matches the project requirements. I often have to start a new file/project and then get one design before I can chat. Also on an initial design I only get 1 screen, but I'd rather get several designs based on a chat to start, instead of chatting and editing after as I feel like I wasted credits to get to that point. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Great for inspiration and quick ideation, but too much work (like all other AI's) to create a real end-product that's ready to market. That's however not the best use-case. Provide a good prompt and it can help you greatly visualise the product you envision. A lot better (at this moment) than the majority of competitors, including Figma Make itself. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The page and project limit for paid accounts is restricted to just five projects, which feels quite limiting. Additionally, I haven't found a straightforward way to export or temporarily archive projects. While the 'variations' feature could be useful, it's disappointing that you can't attach a prompt for the variation to include. Also they're not transparent and honest about their actual reviews. Some pages say 70K and others 300K. In reality it might be just 10K. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.