Roboflow makes computer vision projects surprisingly easy to build and deploy. Uploading images, labeling data, training models, and managing datasets are all intuitive. The platform provides excellent visibility into the workflow, and the API integration was simple to set up. I connected it to my email through Power Automate and was able to automatically trigger model runs with very little effort. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing really. I would provide better instructions for how to use power automate for the api connection but it’s honestly a great product. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As a researcher in computer vision for precision horticulture (detecting apple, cherry, and strawberry fruits, identifying rot defects on sorting lines, monitoring flowering, keypoint detection for tree trunk pose estimation, semantic segmentation, and LIDAR-based navigation of robotic platforms), I find Roboflow an indispensable tool that has seamlessly integrated into our scientific pipeline. The platform allows us to quickly annotate and version datasets, for example for training YOLOv8 and YOLO26 models to detect fruit with rot symptoms, which directly relates to our work on intelligent sorting. I especially appreciate the automated augmentation: although we experiment with generative methods like CycleGAN, Roboflow's built-in augmentations (brightness adjustment, rotation, mosaic) save hours before training starts. The key advantage for us is instant dataset export to dozens of formats — we use YOLO for onboard robotic systems, COCO JSON, and TFRecord — and without Roboflow, conversion would take weeks. I also value cloud hosting with automatic annotation quality checks, which is particularly important when collaborating on thousands of high-resolution orthophotomaps with colleagues (Filippov, Khort, Smirnov). As a result, Roboflow cuts the time from raw drone or robotic platform imagery to a trained neural network roughly fivefold — critical for meeting grant deadlines and publishing in high-impact journals. That is why I give it a 10 out of 10 and strongly recommend Roboflow to anyone working on applied AI in agriculture and robotics. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main drawback I have experienced is the lack of a more flexible pricing policy for academic users with moderate data storage needs. As a research team working on precision horticulture, we often deal with thousands of high‑resolution orthophotomaps and annotated images, yet our grant budgets are limited. The existing pricing tiers either offer very small free quotas or jump to expensive plans that include many enterprise features we do not need. A mid‑level academic plan with reasonable storage limits and lower cost would greatly improve accessibility for university‑based researchers who use Roboflow regularly but cannot justify a full commercial subscription. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I have used Roboflow for a long time to prepare my datasets, and it has become a core part of my workflow. My view is that data is the single most important factor in training a good AI model, and Roboflow is built around exactly that principle.

What I value most is how easy it makes reviewing and cleaning annotations. I can go through a dataset image by image, check every bounding box, correct the ones that are off, and verify or fix the class labels as I go. The dataset health check is excellent for catching problems early: I can see the class distribution at a glance, filter by class, and get a real sense of whether my dataset is balanced before I even start training.

The interface is genuinely intuitive. A trainee on our team prepared their own dataset using Roboflow without any prior experience in deep learning, which says a great deal about how approachable the tool is.

Performance has been fast and reliable, and most importantly it simply works. Importing and exporting datasets in the formats I need is painless, and the integrations side worked well for us too, as we used the API to upload images and download datasets.

Support has always been quick and helpful whenever we needed it. On pricing, the cost was reasonable for our requirements and there was room to negotiate, which I appreciated.

For someone who is borderline obsessive about visualising and understanding their data, I have not found anything better yet. Highly recommended. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The one thing I would flag is pagination. With larger datasets I have run into some issues moving through the images, which can interrupt the review flow. It would be good to see this handled more smoothly at scale. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Easy to understand what to do with a friendly UI&UX.

Data augmentation and AI labeling is a huge plus.

Have many options to train the dataset with high performance.

Able to export and import dataset with annotations to our projects & other accounts & open source in a short time.

Support is very fast in case of any problem or question but generally in two years we just neeeded 2-3 supports. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes dataset import and export functionality doesnt move some classes's annotations without giving an error. I dont dislike anthing else. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Roboflow is a fantastic user-friendly platform that I have used extensively over the past year, mainly to annotate images that are subsequently used to train AI models. Roboflow allows one to annotated images from scratch. The annotated images can then be used in several ways.  First, they can be downloaded to a local computer and be combined with other (annotated) images in future projects.  This prevents the need to annotate a second time and one can choose to use the same train:valid:test distribution as was used in previous projects. Second, the annotated images can be used to develop a version of the project that can be used to train an AI model. Roboflow offers the possibility of preprocessing and augmenting the initial images to create a larger library of images that have a variety of rotation, brightness, hue, etc. Third, the annotated images can be used – via the project version – to train a model directly on the Roboflow platform. Alternatively, Roboflow supports the possibility to download the annotated images (including the preprocessed and augmented images) to another platform where the AI model can be trained. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing. I am sure that Roboflow contains many functions that I do not yet know about. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What has provided the most value for me in Roboflow is the ability to collaborate efficiently during the annotation process, especially when working with academic teams. We often have multiple students and researchers labeling data simultaneously, and the shared workspace makes coordination seamless. Performance-wise, the platform is consistently fast, very intuitive, and reliable, even when handling large datasets or heavier annotation workloads.

In terms of pricing, I genuinely feel that the credit system is very accessible. On several occasions, when I’ve run out of credits, I’ve been able to continue training models with as little as $5, which makes a huge difference for academic projects with limited budgets.

The AI-assisted annotation tools have also been a major advantage. Features like automated labeling and the ability to integrate my own models significantly speed up the workflow. Using SAM 3 for annotations has made the process even more efficient, reducing manual effort and improving consistency across the team. An unexpected benefit has been how easy it is to onboard new contributors—students can start annotating effectively within minutes Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One limitation I’ve encountered with Roboflow is that, as an academic user, I don’t have access to evaluation tools like the confusion matrix or vector analysis. These features are extremely valuable when assessing model performance, especially in research and teaching contexts where understanding misclassifications is essential. Not having access to them makes the evaluation workflow less efficient and forces me to rely on external tools to complete the analysis. It would be very helpful if academic accounts included at least a basic version of these performance metrics, as they would significantly improve the model validation process for students and researchers Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

First, I apologize for writing in Korean.

I started a project with Gemini to work on a project for expressing information on cycle racing. I had no prior knowledge of programming or AI.

I was recommended by Gemini to use YOLO and Roboflow to process it, and I found Roboflow suitable for a beginner like me to learn. When I started labeling to create the initial model, I initially proceeded by roughly drawing rectangles, but after the model was somewhat developed, the 'Smart Select' feature was really convenient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I was inconvenienced by the lack of Korean support. I am a beginner who knows almost nothing about machine learning, and I wish beginner-level education or guides were placed in more prominent locations so that they are easy to follow. In my case, I resolved the necessary parts by asking Gemini. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

As someone who's annotated 1000+ images across detection, segmentation, and pose estimation tasks for multiple projects, Roboflow has become my default platform - not because of hype, but because it consistently removes friction at every stage of the CV pipeline.

The annotation tooling is genuinely best-in-class. The AI labeling suite covers Label Assist, Smart Polygon via SAM, Box Prompting, and Auto Label - each suited for a different stage of the project. For a new dataset with no existing model, Auto Label saves hours. For refinement, Smart Polygon with a single click gets you polygon masks in seconds. Rapid's new annotation control lets you go from AI-generated boxes to production-quality annotations without leaving the platform - that alone has cut my dataset preparation time significantly.

The export flexibility is underrated. Getting your dataset out in COCO, YOLO, Pascal VOC & many other formats with a single click, directly integrated into training scripts via the Python SDK, means zero pipeline glue code. The free tier is genuinely useful - not a crippled trial - and covers storage, annotation, and export for personal and research projects. They even provide you 3 credits which you can further use for fine-tuning your dataset directly on their GPUs, which saves your time if you don't have a good enough computation power locally.

Beyond the product: Roboflow's OSS contributions are real. RF-DETR and the YOLO weight releases aren't marketing - they're models I've actually benchmarked and deployed. Their community engagement on their socials is fast and technically substantive, not just support ticket deflection(shoutout to Trevor). Their engineers push improvements to their GitHub projects almost daily - shoutout to Piotr Skalski, the person who got me into CV in the first place. I’d also suggest you check out their blogs and demo videos; you can learn a lot from them.

If there's one area for improvement, it's that larger dataset operations (bulk re-export, version management at scale) can feel slow on the free tier. A minor friction point given everything else it offers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The main friction I've hit is around pricing transparency at scale.

The free tier is genuinely useful, but the transition to paid tiers involves a credit-based system where it's not always clear upfront how quickly credits deplete for operations like augmentation or Auto Label runs on large datasets. Users with large datasets also run into file size restrictions and slower performance, which I've noticed when working with high-resolution frames from video pipelines.

Additionally, advanced model training and deployment customization options are limited - if you want fine-grained control over training hyperparameters or custom deployment configurations, you'll quickly hit the ceiling and need to export to your own stack.

For a free-tier user doing research projects it's a minor issue, but teams building production pipelines should factor this in early. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AI-powered road damage detection made efficient. Roboflow helps streamline our AI workflow for detecting road surface damage from vehicle-mounted images. The dataset annotation and augmentation tools improve model accuracy across different road conditions and lighting. We can quickly iterate and deploy models, which is essential for near real-time inspection. Overall, it significantly reduces development time and improves reliability in road condition analysis. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While Roboflow is very effective for rapid development, advanced model customization and fine-tuning still require external tools. Additionally, pricing can scale up quickly when working with large datasets or high-volume usage, which may be a concern for long-term projects Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

My favorite thing about Roboflow is how user-friendly it is (for the most part). I've never coded anything before, but needed to do some coding for a post-grad internship; specifically, I was tasked to create something that would automatically detect plastic in images. One of my contacts recommended Roboflow to me, and even though I have run into a couple of challenges, I've been able to do what I needed to do for my internship through Roboflow.

Additionally, I appreciate the support offered. The video tutorials helped me a lot when I was starting out, and, one I got further along, the AI assistant helped me polish my workflows.

Finally, I really appreciate one of the staff members, Gustavo Loureiro dos Reis. He has been so helpful in getting me to finish my project because he is very knowledgeable when it comes to the platform, responsive, and kind. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The least helpful aspect of Roboflow is definitely how difficult it was to get support from an actual person. My company paid for the Core plan, yet we were not able to contact a real Roboflow staff member when we ran into an unsolvable issue. I reached out to the AI assistant, the community forum, and Roboflow support, but nothing worked. The AI assistant was unable to help, the community forum did not receive a response, and Roboflow support (represented by an employee named Lenny) informed us that we did not have access to support and then proceeded to ignore the emails I sent afterward.

The only reason we were able to get support from Gustavo is that after being subscribed to the Core plan for three months, we happened to receive an email offering us the opportunity to schedule a meeting and speak with a real person to review the platform.

Another thing I dislike about Roboflow is that it does not properly advertise how many credits training will take, which led to me exhausting all of mine very early in the month this month. I had been training all my models with custom weights, but decided to test out the new "Neural Architecture Search" feature recently because it was recommended. I had no idea it was going to train so many models and consume so many credits (which I believe is what happened) because that was not made clear beforehand. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.