--- title: AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform Reviews meta_title: 'AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform Reviews 2026: Details, Pricing, & Features | G2' meta_description: Filter 101 reviews by the users' company size, role or industry to find out how AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform works for a business like yours. aggregate_rating: rating_value: 4.5 review_count: 101 scale: '5' date_modified: '2026-11-09' parent_category: name: "DevSecOps\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t" url: https://www.g2.com/categories/devsecops ---

AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform Reviews & Product Details

Value at a Glance

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

2 months

AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform Reviews (101)

Reviews

AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform Reviews (101)

4.5
101 reviews

What do users say?

Generated using AI from real user reviews

Pros & Cons

Generated from real user reviews
View All Pros and Cons
Search reviews
Filter Reviews
Clear Results
G2 reviews are authentic and verified.
Henry A.
HA
Henry A.
Encargado de Cumplimiento y Continuidad +Interino Ciberseguridad
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Powerful and Efficient, Although It Requires Manual Validations"
4.5/5
What do you like best about AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform?

I like that RidgeBot helps me perform security assessments and penetration testing in an automated way, in addition to conducting risk assessments and reviewing vulnerabilities with zero false positives. The modern and robust AI-based technology is something we value for its speed in delivering reports. Furthermore, RidgeBot is easy to use, and although I initially needed to familiarize myself with the tool, once I did, it turned out to be very intuitive. This is something we highly value on the technical side, as we have many solutions and consoles, and the easier they are to use, the faster the adoption. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform?

Look, I think that even though I do the tests, I feel that I still have to do manual tests to have the confidence of a well-robust analysis. I think that with the audit compliance times, there are issues that I believe can be improved. Those are my only observations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Daniel Felipe P.
DP
Daniel Felipe P.
Jefe de Gestión de Tecnologías, Redes y Sistemas
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Powerful Vulnerability Assessment and Remediation Capabilities"
5/5
What do you like best about AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform?

What I like most about RidgeBot is its ability to proactively identify vulnerabilities and provide actionable remediation guidance. Instead of simply reporting security issues, the platform helps us understand the associated risks and suggests practical mitigation and patching measures. This significantly improves the efficiency of our vulnerability management process and supports a more proactive cybersecurity strategy. Additionally, the platform was easy to deploy and delivered valuable results during our Proof of Concept, demonstrating its effectiveness in strengthening our security posture. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform?

During our Proof of Concept, we did not encounter any major issues. If I had to suggest an improvement, it would be expanding the documentation and providing more advanced reporting and customization options to help organizations get even more value from the platform. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Christopher G.
CG
Christopher G.
IT Manager
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Quick, Easy Vulnerability Identification and Risk Validation"
4.5/5
What do you like best about AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform?

What I like with this product is that it is quick and easy to use and to identify vulnerabilities, simulate attacks and validate risks of our systems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform?

Could have provide more details on resolutions in the generated report and lower its cost for domain (FQDN) as a target. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

EM
Eugenia M.
VP Operations
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Originally submitted 4/29/2024
"The perfect way to get more results, strike first and detect sooner."
5/5
What do you like best about AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform?

I like the way I can validate the defense of my investments on security platforms in a controlled manner. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform?

More AI integrations so you can add tests with regular language and have the platform do the setup for you Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Kristine Claire R.
KR
Kristine Claire R.
Pre-Sales Engineer
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Originally submitted 8/3/2025
"Ridge Security delivers an automated VAPT that simplifies every SOC's journey"
5/5
What do you like best about AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform?

The platform features an intuitive, user-friendly interface that is easy to navigate. It delivers validated risk scores, helping SOC teams reduce false positives and focus on real threats. Its fully AI-driven capabilities significantly streamline and simplify the SOC experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform?

The advanced configuration options could benefit from more comprehensive documentation, particularly to assist new users during initial setup and onboarding Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

RH
Rafael H.
CIO/CISO
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Exceptional power of use"
4/5
What do you like best about AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform?

Its power of use, developing very powerful analyses on the assets Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform?

Its licensing model, which distances its use in environments like ours that do not need such constant analysis and only require a confirmation of their status once or twice a year, but need that confirmation for legal requirements. It also distances it from use in special itinerant analyses that would require a credit model for our users who go to the solar plants.

I also miss some templates that would allow it to be used, for example, in "non-invasive" mode to be able to use it in high-criticality environments where nothing can fail, but without having to customize everything to ensure that nothing important is taken out of service.

Support for OT devices could also be improved. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

RR
Regidor R.
Lead System Engineer
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Originally submitted 4/24/2024
"Effective Security Validation with RidgeBot"
5/5
What do you like best about AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform?

I like that RidgeBot has no false positive results and can determine the impact of business criticality. It solves the problem of security validation by not only showing vulnerabilities but also validating them and confirming their business impact. Compared to other vulnerability assessment tools, RidgeBot tests or validates vulnerabilities to confirm if they are technically hackable and identifies the business impact, helping me know what to prioritize first. The initial setup is easy and straightforward. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform?

I think the documentation is lacking information especially on installation and upgrades. Also, some versions require a lot of resources. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Hayward S.
HS
Hayward S.
Assessor de TI
Enterprise (> 1000 emp.)
"Amazing Proof of Concept: attack automation is the differentiator of RidgeBot"
5/5
What do you like best about AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform?

We conducted a Proof of Concept at the company where I work for the RidgeBot solution, and the result was surprising. Our colleagues from the Red Team benefited the most, but the automation of attacks is truly a differentiator of the solution. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform?

A disadvantage (although it's not exactly that) is that the tool automates so many things that, if the team wants to customize or do something simpler and more granular, it doesn't allow it. On the other hand, that is precisely the proposal: it was made to work that way. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Jomir L.
JL
Jomir L.
CEO
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
"Automated Pen Testing That Boosts Productivity"
5/5
What do you like best about AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform?

Automated Penetration Testing for more proditivity Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform?

Don't completely replace a pentesting manual.

While advanced, it lacks the creativity and contextual analysis skills of a pentester's experience. Business logic flaws and complex scenarios still require human evaluation. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

KM
Katharine M.
Consult IT
Mid-Market (51-1000 emp.)
"Centralized, Intuitive, and Effortless Platform"
4.5/5
What do you like best about AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform?

RidgeBot is like having an automated penetration tester that works incredibly well. Its biggest advantage is that it not only lists vulnerabilities but also autonomously tests whether they can be exploited, saving you hours of manual validation and giving you a true picture of the risk. It integrates seamlessly into your development processes to find security issues early, without delaying releases. In short, it's an ideal tool for teams that need to scale their security, efficiently prioritizing critical threats and providing clear reports for immediate action. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform?

RidgeBot is a formidable tool for automating security, but it's fair to point out that its highly polished approach comes with a slight trade-off. By prioritizing efficiency and predefined workflows, it can feel a bit rigid for pentesting purists who enjoy the complete control and creative improvisation of tools like Metasploit. It's like comparing a high-end GPS to the freedom of navigating with a map: the former is incredibly efficient, but the latter allows you to discover alternative routes that automation might miss. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Pricing Insights

Averages based on real user reviews.

Time to Implement

2 months

Return on Investment

11 months

Average Discount

11%

AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform Comparisons
AI-Native Continuous Offensive Security Platform Features
API
Extensibility
Reporting and Analytics
Issue Tracking
Reconnaissance
Vulnerability Scan
Command-Line Tools
Manual Testing
Test Automation
Vulnerability Intelligence
Compliance Monitoring
Continuous Monitoring