What I like most about LILT is its intuitive and user-friendly design. The platform is easy to navigate, significantly reducing the time spent managing projects and allowing me to focus on supporting our language teams and ministry partners. LILT also streamlines our translation workflow by centralizing requests, assignments, and deliveries in one place. This efficiency, combined with its translation memory and terminology management features, helps us work faster while maintaining consistency and quality across languages. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One area where I think LILT could improve is in the administrator and project manager experience. While the platform is excellent for day-to-day translation work, some administrative functions could be more robust. For example, it can be challenging to locate projects when you do not know the exact project name, and the filtering and search capabilities could be more flexible. I would also appreciate more advanced reporting options and the ability to create customized reports that better fit our operational and management needs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

LILT gives helpful AI suggestions and makes translation faster. It’s also useful for keeping terms more consistent across files. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the suggestions still need a lot of review, especially when it comes to context, or making the phrasing sound more natural. I’ve also noticed that the portal doesn’t always work as expected, like not picking up preferred translations consistently or having issues opening files. I wish the overall file/workflow experience was a bit easier and more reliable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I appreciate most is how easy it is to keep terminology consistent across projects. The interface is straightforward, collaboration is smooth, and the suggestions from previous translations are often helpful. Overall, it makes the workflow faster and more organized. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are a few areas that could be improved. On larger projects, segments can sometimes take longer to load, and opening terminology or glossary entries may occasionally feel slow. In some cases, machine translation suggestions also require additional editing. These are not major issues, but improving performance on bigger workloads would make the overall experience even better. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

If I need a quick translation, that’s possible. For more complex projects, like videos with embedded images, voiceover, or on-screen text, I can discuss the details with a project manager to make sure I get the output I need. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

My projects and documents are fairly complex, with videos, embedded images, and eLearnings, so there was definitely a learning curve. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I appreciate LILT's adaptive engine, which was unique in the market when I first considered them. The engine's ability to adapt based on our edits is a major advantage. The built-in analytical tools for tracking KPIs are extremely helpful. LILT's ability to connect with other AI providers is highly valuable for us as an AI-focused company. The commercial and customer service teams have been responsive to our needs and queries. Moreover, they have been involved in developing features to create a more integrated and consolidated platform for all our localization needs throughout the lifecycle. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I think the thing that probably needs to be further improved is the stability of the platform. Sometimes the engine slows down. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

You can easily change one repetitive word throughout the whole document. Now there’s also a suggestion for other translations that may be better, and you can choose from there. It’s helpful. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes lines get blocked and need fixing. It’s easy to unblock them, but I don’t understand why they’re blocked in the first place. Sometimes it also cuts off words, and the translation is obviously wrong, which makes it hard to edit. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Their teams of account managers are great. They are easy to work with and always ready to help. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

LILT is an AI-first solution, and that does not necessarily equal quality. Even in spite of their models being trained to align with our content style and human translators reviewing the output, quality is still inconsistent across language pairs and a significant amount of post-delivery editing is required sometimes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It allows you to edit omissions or errors in real time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

You have to select each entry individually, and sometimes after selecting all the entries, the DONE BUTTON takes a while to appear. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

LILT's professional team is the best part of our partnership with them. Their platform is also easy to use. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Currently, we need to do a lot of additional work to sync our repeat translations, but that will get better with additional jobs in LILT. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

They are always willing to help find a solution Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Nothing, LILT could only be highly recommended by me Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.