I primarily use IntelliJ IDEA for Java backend development. I like its intelligent code completion, fast navigation, built-in debugging, and seamless Git integration. It makes Java development more efficient and improves productivity. It speeds up development with smart code completion, easy debugging, built-in Git support, and powerful refactoring tools. The smart code completion reduces typing, navigation makes it easy to find classes and methods, the debugger helps quickly identify issues, and Git integration simplifies version control without leaving the IDE. The initial setup was straightforward. The installation wizard and built-in support for Maven and Git made it easy to get started. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find IntelliJ IDEA can be resource-intensive on large projects, and some advanced features have a learning curve for new users like me. Features like advanced debugging, profiling, and custom IDE settings can take some time to learn. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Feasible for writing the java code, and implementation of spring services was easily done with the less amount of steps also mostly we can use more extensions which makes to write our code in a structured way, easy to handle git commands, By seeing that UI our mind gets more interested and focused to write a code. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Slow startup times and high memory usage also Complex project setup like Initial configuration for external build tools, plugins, or specific non-standard frameworks can be tedious. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Jetbrains IDEs have a consistent UI/UX over different Operating Systems, IntelliJ is no different. Your learning is used accross other IDEs and Operating System - they have been consistent for years, but also keep improving the experience with care for our workflow.

It is easy to add integration and plugins - and there are plenty on the community, of course for all AI major providers. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Performance was a challenging in the past, but this has improved consistently over the years, and knowdays it isn't an issue anymore.

It is a bit pricier, as it is subscription based - but for professionals is well worth the price. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use IntelliJ IDEA for my day-to-day Java and Kotlin development. The thing I like most about it is the built-in debugger. The debugging experience in IntelliJ IDEA is really smooth and reliable. I’ve tried multiple IDEs, such as Cursor, Antigravity, and VS Code, but none of them has given me the same kind of debugging experience as IntelliJ IDEA. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

With the recent introduction of AI agents in coding IDEs, IntelliJ IDEA feels like it’s lacking. It does offer integration with GitHub Copilot and Cursor, but the accuracy and overall capability of the newer AI agent–powered tools are far better than what IntelliJ IDEA currently provides. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

IntelliJ IDEA makes Java development much faster and more efficient. Its intelligent code completion, refactoring support, and debugging tools help catch issues early and reduce development time. I also like how well it integrates with Maven, Gradle, Git, Spring Boot, and databases, allowing me to work from a single IDE without constantly switching tools. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

IntelliJ IDEA can be resource-intensive, especially when working on large projects, which may affect performance on systems with limited memory. Some advanced features are only available in the Ultimate edition, and the IDE can feel overwhelming for new users because of the large number of settings and options available. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about IntelliJ IDEA is its smart code assistance and auto-completion, which helps me write code faster and with fewer mistakes. It also has strong debugging tools and makes it easy to navigate large projects. Overall, it improves productivity and makes development more efficient. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike about IntelliJ IDEA is that it can feel heavy and slow on lower-spec computers, especially when opening large projects. It also uses a lot of memory, which can affect performance if multiple applications are running. Sometimes the interface can feel a bit complex for beginners due to the number of features and settings. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about IntelliJ IDEA is its intelligent code completion, powerful debugging tools, and seamless integration with version control systems. The user interface is intuitive and highly customizable, which makes it easy to navigate large projects. Performance also remains reliable, even when working with complex applications. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

While the platform offers extensive features and integrations, the sheer number of options can create a learning curve for new users. Some advanced capabilities are limited to the Ultimate editions, which may increase costs for teams with budget constraints. Improvements in performance optimization, faster indexing, and making premium features more accessible would further enhance the overall user experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I’ve been using IntelliJ IDEA for a really long time. It clearly highlights errors, and debugging with breakpoints is straightforward. The code readability and the way it helps with project structure are just too good. It also integrates easily with databases through plugins, and it supports Maven and Gradle. There are so many features available that it genuinely makes coding fun. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes it uses a lot of my system resources. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

To me, it’s one of the best IDEs. It’s easy to use and gives me great control and access to my code, along with extra features such as database tools. The UI is very good, especially compared to Visual Studio Code, and I also like the default key mappings. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Some features take a long time to arrive. I use it on both Mac and Windows machines. On Windows, I mainly use it with WSL, and it took a long time to get proper native WSL support compared to Visual Studio Code, which implemented it almost immediately. Even now, I still struggle to get Codex/Claude working properly through Windows WSL. If you’re developing on Windows without WSL, it should be good, and it also works well on Mac. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like best about IntelliJ IDEA is how intelligently it understands the codebase. The autocomplete, debugging tools, and refactoring support genuinely save a lot of time, especially in large Java or Spring Boot projects. It also makes navigating between files, classes, and dependencies feel very smooth compared to many other IDEs. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One thing I dislike about IntelliJ IDEA is that it can be pretty heavy on system resources, especially on laptops with limited RAM. Large projects sometimes make it feel slow to start or index files. Also, some useful features are locked behind the Ultimate version, which can be frustrating for students or developers who want everything in one place. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.