Descartes Denied Party Screening Reviews & Product Details

Descartes is a very comprehensive platform. I love that it screens hundreds of government and international watchlists. The AI feature helps to reduce false positives. The platform is built to keep up with changes. It reduces compliance risk and supports business growth. Descartes is flexible, easy to implement, and interfaces with many other platforms. Customer support is there. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Onboarding can be slow with the setup process feeling overwhelming and complex at times. For smaller organizations, the pricing isn't as affordable as other platforms. Integration may not always interface with other systems. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find Descartes Denied Party Screening simple to use and navigate. The alerts are straightforward, making them easy to understand and identify. I appreciate being able to quickly identify any individual that comes on site and screen their country of origin within seconds. The setup was also very easy, and I could use it effectively in just a few days. I think it's excellent, easily accessible, and comprehensive for my duties. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There isn't anything I don't like about this program. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I love the ease of use and the comfort of knowing I am using a reliable source to screen parties. The tool is not complicated, and I can navigate it without too much hassle. The parameters preset by my organization make the task seamless. It's comforting to know that a party is being screened with ease against the multitude of Denied Party Lists. Setting up Descartes Denied Party Screening was not difficult, and overall, I love the tool. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find the two key authenticator needed when signing in a bit bothersome. While I understand its importance, it can take some time to receive the verification code. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like most about Descartes Denied Party Screening? The most useful aspect of Descartes Denied Party Screening is its comprehensive database of restricted parties, which helps businesses ensure compliance with government regulations and avoid engaging in trade with entities on sanctions lists. It provides a simple and automated solution to prevent potential legal risks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you like least about Descartes Denied Party Screening? One downside is that the system can sometimes generate false positives, flagging entities that are not actually restricted. This may lead to unnecessary manual verification steps, which can be time-consuming. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find Descartes Denied Party Screening very user-friendly and appreciate how quick it is with immediate responses. It gives me peace of mind knowing I don't have to worry about restricted parties, as Descartes finds alerts efficiently. I also use the compliance manager alongside it, which works really well in tandem, helping me clear alerts and providing visibility through graphs and charts about the alerts we're receiving and their origins. The initial setup was very easy, thanks to the training modules that helped us transition smoothly. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like everything about the product! Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

We use the Descartes Denied Party Screening daily. We appreciate all the lists they review at one time. Once implemented, the app is easy to use and gives us all the information we need for each screening to be in compliance with our auditors. the state mandates and IRS. The Customer Support is on point and very knowledgeable. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I have yet to find any portion of the process to be detrimental to the outcome we require. The integration process does not have flaws and is very straight forward. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I feel like descartes is easy to use, and it provides the exact information I need to filter what I am looking for. It has helped me a lot to validate our company's customer. I use it everyday and it's very good for my daily basis. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The only thing I would changes about Descartes Denied Party is the levels of risk its shows, to make it more understandable and I would add a lot more information about the matches. Besides that, all good. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The most helpful about Descartes Denied Party Screening is that you get to choose which Country when searching up an individual and and not only that you get clear information when there are hits. I use it everyday, and i was able to grasp on how to use it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I dislike about Descartes Denied Party Screening is that it ask to put notes twice on why your clearing the hit from the person you searched up. I would like for it to have a helpful note/hint when clearing an individual, meaning it should help us explain what to put on the notes. When I train my coworkers they also ask how to describe or explain someone who doesn't match the hit. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that I am able to audit my teams screenings. That allows me to see what is being missed and what are we great at from a compliance perspective. 2nd: Being able to create a distribution list saves me countless minutes typing emails. The team was able to implement and integrate in to their SOP easily on 1st, 2nd and 3rd shift. I have changed roles since last submitting a review. I ensure my team checks their RPS daily to clear hits in ENVOY. Envoy allows us to check the hits from the portal without logging in to our Descarted portal. If we have any questions, we know we reach our on site customer support and know can call you all at the general help line. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I dislike that the system ENVOY does not clear teh HIT daily for a repeat visitor. Our team has to clear the hit daily. Why cant the system use a fuzzy logic code to see if we previously did it recently? I think its because a person can violate something but if we are clearing the same 10 or 15 year violation, why cant the system recognized that THIS violation was cleared for THIS person already. Its not as if it is a new violation that occured last month that needs to be cleared. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The amount of the data/sanctions lists/BIS lists is really impressive

The UI of the tool is very easy and can be explained to an avegare user/non-industry analysts in minutes. It is so easy to screen even if limited data on the customer is available. It is easy to create a pdf report and save/share the results. The report with no matches is also a handy feature for audit trail of safe entities

The updates on the sanctioned entities/individuals are provided quite fast

Country risk overview provides useful data on the country risks Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Consolidation of numerous results into one report would be handy

More identification details on individuals (DOB, number of ID/Passport) would help to identify false positive matches better

Sometimes the report is so long that it does not fully fit into the space with additional details and some data is not visible

Special symbols from local languages might not be recognized even when a fuzzy 2 level is applied Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.