The AI-powered autocomplete is genuinely impressive — it understands context across multiple files, not just the current one. The inline chat and CMD+K for quick edits make it feel like pair programming rather than just code completion. Tab completions are fast and accurate enough that I actually trust them. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The support experience leaves a lot to be desired — response times are slow and issues often go unresolved for days. The billing and subscription management can be confusing, and when things break (like context window limits or sync issues), there's not much transparency on what's happening. The documentation also lags behind new features. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The UI of the agents window, and how I can see the changes directly in the code and in the UI field. The speed is also outstanding, and the choice is great. You offer all the flagship models at reasonable prices. We pay just 60$ and the value is amazing. We also integrated it into many parts of the system, and it's great. AI is clever, and the program's onboarding is really simple; you just code. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Perhaps that can remove older models of the Composer, i really like to use them for the simplest tasks to save costs, even though the cost is already low :D Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like that Cursor is user-friendly, which makes it easy to navigate. The main thing I like about Cursor is that it feels intuitive. I also appreciate the picture-in-picture mode, which works really well. I find the code base indexing in Cursor very helpful because it allows the AI to understand the project structure and provide context to suggestions. It reduces my cognitive load and speeds up the transition from an idea to working code. Cursor enhances my ability by understanding the relationship between different files and significantly reduces context switching, which boosts my productivity. The initial setup of Cursor was easy because I could install it like a normal desktop app and launch it from my existing VS Code settings, extensions, and themes. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I wish Cursor was more like the Chrome browser. I use it mainly for software development, but I'd like to use it for everyday tasks too. If its AI native features could automate the creation of repetitive tasks and the development of integrated systems, it would be more useful.The pricing of the software could have been better against performance. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about Cursor is that it does understand the context of the entire project, not just the line where you are.

For example, when working with FastAPI, I can ask it to adjust an endpoint and it automatically takes into account models, services, and even other related files. This saves a lot of time compared to copying and pasting code into a chat.

It is also very useful for refactors: you tell it "change this logic throughout the project" and it does it quite well, maintaining consistency. This is really felt in real projects.

And a key thing is that it serves more for thinking than Copilot. It not only autocompletes, but you can discuss a solution directly on your code, as if it were another dev deeply involved in the repo. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I don't like is that sometimes it goes overboard with being "creative."

When you ask for something specific, it can end up changing more than necessary or proposing a solution that doesn't quite fit with your architecture. In projects with already defined logic (like well-structured APIs in FastAPI), this forces you to review everything with a fine-tooth comb.

It also depends a lot on the context it has loaded. If it doesn't fully understand the complete flow, it starts to assume things and that can break coherence between files. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use Cursor on a daily basis as my best buddy. It helps me write code, create AI agents, debug issues, find the RCA, do POCs, and—most importantly—create documents for my team and org about the work I’m doing. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes, when working with multiple agents, it uses too much memory. Apart from that, there’s nothing else to mention. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most is how seamlessly Cursor integrates into my coding workflow. Instead of switching between tools or constantly Googling things, I can ask Cursor directly inside the editor. It’s especially helpful when I’m working on repetitive code or trying to understand unfamiliar parts of a codebase. The inline suggestions and the ability to edit code using prompts feel very natural once you get used to them.

I also like that it shows the changes made across all files, so it’s easier to keep track of what’s been updated. It responds very quickly and generates code fast as well.

Setup is basically effortless: you just install it, log in with your account, and you’re good to go. Pricing seems mostly in line with other tools available.

Another plus is that I can run the application inside it, so I don’t have to open another IDE. I use it for my day-to-day coding and for generating my API documentation as it has the context of API's. It has become so easy to share API docs across teams. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes it overcomplicates things when, in reality, the solution is very simple. At times it touches the code even though we have asked it not to touch or update it.

It also tries to create generic code when it isn’t needed, and ends up adding many functions and extra logic around it. This makes the code reviewer’s responsibility more complex, because we have to thoroughly check the commits and ensure no unwanted changes go to production.

If it can better understand the question, and also understand the coding patterns and logic of the codebase, and then write code in a similar style, it would be very helpful. It should only use generic code or good coding patterns when we specifically ask for it. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The ability to integrate code directly into my files when I prompt in chat, and to get a code review as well, really helps me. It lets me review the code myself instead of completely depending on AI to change my code and then having to look for the changes afterward. The UI is clean and structured and the agents like stripe and temporal helps with the context when I'm integrating 3rd party APIs or SDKs Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The tokens, compare to other dedicated models the tokens in cursor is getting used a lot and all the best models like opus will hit the limit pretty fast Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

being able to run multiple agents at the same time saves hours of work and money. mass file generation makes mundane programs better by allowing more time to focus on program purpose. never had to deal with customer support. integration into program dev made easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

AI still struggles to tell when it should switch from ask to agent or plan modes. Circular reasoning and drift remain a big problem. The AI should be able to ask other AIs for peer review before giving answers to users. Also, the rules should be understood from near the beginning—for example, obeying tech manuals and industry standards when appropriate. multiple servers should be able to be worked on at the same time from the same agent window Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

İ really like Cursor's quota because, thanks to its own models and the agreements it has made with xai, the models hardly use up my plan's quota. i'm pleased with how well it uses the agent tools. i like the composer 2.5 model because it's really great and very affordable. it offers me a lot of productivity on a budget of around $20. i think the single monthly quota system is great. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I find the chat history reappearing annoying even after I've deleted them, and I think the code editor optimization is poor, it's even terrible. I constantly deal with deleting chats for no reason, and it slows down significantly when opening long folders, unlike Visual Studio Code which is really fast. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I’m able to accomplish tasks of varying complexity and still get excellent results. Most of my interactions with the agent are through the auto feature. I also use the Plan feature quite a bit, since it lets me steer the implementation before I kick it off. Beyond general product features and bug fixes, I’ve also had good luck using the agent to navigate ops work. Overall, it’s streamlined our ability to ship quality releases. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I haven't fully embraced the Agents view and tend to stick to the standard IDE view. This is primarily due to needing visibility to make corrections in the codebase. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.