BrowserStack Reviews & Product Details

It allows to use unbelievable device range and it is more easier for QA purposes.

It gives simple and ease implementation guide an it would be very helpful for beginners.

You can easily chat with them and get response within few hours and also they allow me extra free trial before go purchase a plan.

No downtimes at all. You can use any time in the day and also they allows users to see the downtimes.

When you go for a browserstack, you can definitely simplify your CI/CD integrations. Because they have easy integrations as well as you can save your VM's resource utilizations. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

When we purchase the plan, default parallel count is limited to 01. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

There are many things I like about BrowserStack. Mentioning some best things about it:

1. Latest devices & OS will get an update on this platform very quickly.

2. Browserstack customer support team is very proactive and supportive.

3. Easy to use.

4. Newly launched feature Recent Test is very time-saving in our testing scenarios.

5. Fast connectivity & switching between devices.

6. Availability of almost every device with several OS options in the listing.

7. Reliable results just like real device. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I have been using BrowserStack for so many years regularly and I don't think there is anything missing. Worth money products and services. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The most amazing feature of BrowserStack is that it lets users access and use almost any mobile device without physically owning it. It also includes the latest devices, which makes it easy to stay up to date while testing. Another big advantage is the ability to test on multiple mobile devices at the same time (in parallel), which saves a lot of time. Almost all the browsers available in the market are supported on BrowserStack as well.

BrowserStack also supports automation testing for both mobile and web platforms. We can integrate TestFlight with BrowserStack for build generation, and I find this to be a very useful feature. For iOS devices, users can also simulate offline scenarios, which helps when validating app behavior under different network conditions.

And BrowserStack is super easy to use, even junior QAs can use it easily. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

A few things I dislike about BrowserStack are that, at times, it takes a long time to load mobile devices, which makes testing feel very slow. For Android devices, offline simulation still isn’t possible. As a user, I should be able to toggle mobile device settings and temporarily access the phone storage. Also, during peak hours, devices aren’t available. Finally, automation takes a lot of time as well, and it really should be faster. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What I like most about Browsers tack is the real device cloud. It lets me test our mobile application on actual iOS devices, such as the iPhone 13 and iPhone 14, without having to maintain physical devices myself. In my day-to-day work, I use it to verify barcode scanning by using the image injection feature after uploading the app to App Live. This approach helps me validate real-time behavior and catch device-specific issues more effectively. I also find the options to capture logs, screenshots, and session recordings very helpful, since they make debugging much easier. On top of that, support for parallel execution in automation helps reduce overall testing time. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

At times, device sessions disconnect unexpectedly or take a while to start, especially during peak hours. I’ve also noticed slight input and response delays when interacting with real devices compared to using physical devices directly. In addition, the availability of certain specific devices, such as particular iPhone models, can be limited from time to time. While the debugging tools are helpful overall, having more detailed logs for hardware-related issues (for example, external scanner devices) would make troubleshooting easier and improve the experience. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

To be honest, the device library is insane. I'm a student, and I don't own like 10 different phones, so the ability to open a real Samsung or iPhone right in my browser to test out my GitHub Pages site was super helpful. The UI is pretty intuitive too, so I didn't even need to look at any documentation to figure it out. The partnership with GitHub that gets you the free mobile plan is a really nice touch, too. As a student, that kind of stuff matters a lot. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The remote devices sometimes have a delay, especially with mobile devices, where clicking around is a bit delayed. Also, the price is high if you're not using a free plan. I wish there were more features included with the student/edu plan because many students would actually use that more if it were more accessible. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use BrowserStack for test management, and I really like how it allows me to do live testing on multiple mobile versions and operating systems. It's great for when I don't have access to specific versions, and it saves me a lot of time in my testing work. I also appreciate how BrowserStack updates every variation so quickly. If there's a new operating system update, it shows up in BrowserStack the next day, which is super helpful for testing new updates. It's invaluable for ensuring applications work fine on all these new updates. Additionally, the user interface is pretty easy and can be understood by anyone with basic knowledge of management tools. Overall, it's a simple system to understand. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Sometimes the AI automation system in BrowserStack doesn't work consistently. When trying to create a flow and record steps, the keys can fail during the process. This variation means that sometimes they pass and sometimes they don't, which needs to be improved or updated. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I use BrowserStack for mobile manual and automation testing, web automation, and manual tests as well as a test management tool. I like the various availability of different devices, which is really helpful for my testing needs. The App Live and Web Live features provide various mobiles and operating systems, which are great for my testing requirements. It also helps me keep the automation reports and tasks in pace. Shifting to BrowserStack has helped us be more organized and test case driven, and we're able to display testing coverage to clients more effectively. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

The testcase creation and test run management can be improved. The creation of reports needs to be improved. Also, the test cases should be updated when an automation test run is also updated. A field for adding the test data could be helpful along with steps and results. There is some minor issue during testcase creation from Jira, where the selecting of folder is not persisting. The reports generated sometimes do not cover the automation index. Also, the dark theme needs to be introduced. In addition, multiple TC ID tagging has to be provided. The JIRA integration has some issues while logging defects from the automation report. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

It’s easy for me to debug my automation failures because it records a buffer-free video of my automation execution. I use the test management feature, which helps me track bugs and execute cases easily. The test management tool also helps me configure my cases according to different platforms, and even adjust the same cases based on the platform requirements.

Migrating our manual cases is also very easy, which reduces the effort of writing cases again when they’re already present. I use test runs frequently, as I execute manual execution through BrowserStack. The customer support team also tries to provide the best solution possible. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

- Integrating jira with our project for each user separately

- existing bugs in test management tool

- iframe of browserstack in the jira tool

- Bug raising to jira through browserstack Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

I like how easy it is to integrate automation using YAML config, which reduces effort in maintaining the automation pipeline. I find the new test management tool very useful for managing test case inventory, tracking test execution, and viewing coverage stats. I also value the test management feature because it helps organize and maintain our test case inventory efficiently, while making tracking test execution, reporting results, and monitoring coverage much easier. I appreciate that there was enough documentation provided by BrowserStack, making the initial setup not hard and quite easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

One area that could be improved is the test management section, especially with more advanced filtering and search options. Better filtering would make it easier to quickly find specific cases and manage large test inventories more efficiently. I wanted to search the test cases based on the name, right now it is not that much easy. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

BrowserStack is most helpful for quickly testing across a wide range of real devices and browsers without needing to maintain that hardware internally. It saves time, makes cross-platform QA much easier, and helps us catch device-specific issues earlier in the development process. It is especially useful for verifying behavior on different OS and browser combinations in one place. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Overall it is very useful, but performance and session setup speed is a bit slow compared to testing locally, however I'm not sure if anything can be done at this point. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.