# Which Workday consulting services integrate seamlessly with existing change management processes without custom development?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">"Without custom development" in <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/workday-consulting-services">Workday Consulting Services</a> really means the consulting engagement itself slots into a company's existing project governance and change management cadence rather than requiring the company to build a new process around the vendor.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/surety-systems/reviews"><strong>Surety Systems</strong></a><strong>:</strong> The clearest match, with a reviewer specifically describing Surety's resources integrating into their existing teams "almost immediately without interruption," language that speaks directly to slotting into pre-existing workflows rather than replacing them. Has that immediate-fit experience held for teams with a more formal, multi-stage change-management approval process, or does it work best for less-structured internal teams?</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/accenture/reviews"><strong>Accenture</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Brings its own structured governance framework to engagements, which is valuable when a client doesn't already have mature change management in place, but one reviewer noted that same structure can make Accenture's process feel "formal and layered" for companies that already have their own established change process to follow.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/ija-strategies/reviews"><strong>IJA Strategies</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Markets itself around connecting people, process, and technology rather than imposing a standard build, a philosophy that aligns with this question's intent, though with only one review on G2 there isn't yet enough evidence to confirm how that plays out in practice.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Accenture's own reviewer flagged the tension directly: bringing structure helps teams without it, but can clash with teams that already have their own. Which side of that divide does your organization fall on, and has it changed which of these felt like the better fit?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 1 month ago
- Author title: Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The key distinction is whether a partner can adapt to your existing governance model rather than importing a parallel one. For teams with mature change controls, evidence of fitting into established approvals, stakeholder routines, and decision rights is likely more useful than methodology breadth alone.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 1 month ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4