# Which RASP platforms provide audit logs and compliance reporting that satisfy SOC 2 and PCI DSS requirements so security teams can demonstrate runtime control coverage to auditors?

Which RASP platforms provide audit logs and compliance reporting that meet SOC 2 and PCI DSS requirements, enabling security teams to demonstrate runtime control coverage to auditors? The real need is evidence: not just protection, but the logs and reports that let you show an auditor your runtime controls exist and are working. These are picks from the Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP) Tools category most relevant to that reporting angle.

Dynatrace (4.5 stars, 1,365 reviews) - reviewers lean on detailed logging, alerting, and dashboards across the stack, plus SLA and threshold controls and anomaly detection, which produces the continuous, documented visibility that supports audit evidence. Runtime security is one module within a broader platform, so confirm which specific reports you need.
Jscrambler (4.4 stars, 31 reviews) - notably, reviewers use it directly for PCI DSS controls, including payment-page integrity monitoring to meet PCI DSS 4.0, which is about as on-point as the compliance angle gets. Scope is client-side, so pair it with server-side coverage.
OpenText Core Application Security (4.1 stars, 34 reviews) - on the OpenText side, reviewers cite centralized visibility into application use and abuse and real-time control over sensitive data, which maps to the control-coverage story auditors want. A few find the reporting interface clunky.
Imperva Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP) (5.0 stars, 2 reviews) - built to give visibility into runtime behavior and block exploits in real time, supporting a demonstrable active-control posture, though its very small review base means the reporting specifics are worth confirming with the vendor.

Which framework is driving this first, SOC 2 or PCI DSS? And do you need the tool to generate evidence itself, or feed a SIEM you already report from?

##### Post Metadata - Posted at: 21 days ago - Author title: Marketer - Net upvotes: 1 ## Comments ### Comment 1 <p>Jscrambler is the only one of the four making a named-control claim, PCI DSS 4.0 payment-page integrity monitoring specifically, rather than the more generic "this produces evidence auditors would want" language the other three lean on. That's a real distinction if PCI DSS is the actual driver, since a named control mapping is a much easier conversation with an auditor than generic logging and visibility you have to argue maps to a requirement. The tradeoff is scope: Jscrambler only covers the client-side payment page, so it wouldn't stand alone for a broader PCI DSS or SOC 2 scope covering server-side controls. Has anyone actually walked an auditor through Dynatrace's or OpenText's reports and had them accept it as sufficient evidence, or did it need extra explanation to map to the specific control?</p> ##### Comment Metadata - Posted at: 14 days ago - Author title: SEO Content Writer ## Related discussions - [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team) - Posted at: about 13 years ago - Comments: 6 - [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section) - Posted at: about 13 years ago - Comments: 0 - [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm) - Posted at: about 13 years ago - Comments: 4