# Which pharmacy management systems support patient counseling workflows for teams of 11-50 people?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Mid-sized pharmacy teams in that 11-50 range have outgrown basic setups but aren't running enterprise operations. Patient counseling at that scale usually means a few pharmacists doing high-touch work, not just dispensing volume. I've been looking at how different <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/pharmacy-management-systems">pharmacy management systems</a> hold up for that specific context.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/primerx/reviews"><strong>PrimeRx</strong></a>: Assessment features and patient engagement tools come up in reviews from teams doing clinical pharmacy services beyond standard dispensing. Mid-sized pharmacy reviewers describe solid patient profile management and the ability to adapt counseling workflows to their own protocols.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/datascan-pharmacy-software/reviews"><strong>Datascan Pharmacy Software</strong></a>: Reviews from mid-sized independents describe a system that adapts to non-standard pharmacy workflows, including compounding and specialty settings where counseling documentation is more involved. The team is noted for building out those specific requirements rather than asking you to work around the defaults.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/frameworkltc/reviews"><strong>FrameworkLTC</strong></a>: Built for LTC where counseling is embedded in every medication cycle. Mid-sized LTC teams specifically note that the software handles administrative automation well enough that pharmacists get more time for the actual clinical work.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/computer-rx/reviews"><strong>Computer-Rx</strong></a>: Note and chart functions are described as useful for counseling documentation in a standard retail context. Simpler overall, which works for teams whose counseling needs are relatively straightforward.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For pharmacy teams in that 11-50 range, how much of your counseling workflow actually lives inside your PMS versus a separate tool, and has that split ever caused a real problem?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;For a team that size, I’d want most counseling notes and follow-up activity inside the PMS so the patient record stays complete. The split starts becoming a real problem when staff have to check two systems to understand what was discussed or what still needs action.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 20 days ago
- Author title: Marketer



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;FrameworkLTC automating enough of the administrative side that pharmacists get more time for the actual clinical work is genuinely meaningful. Counseling quality goes up when pharmacists aren&#39;t spending half their shift on paperwork.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 21 days ago
- Author title: Writer



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;At that team size, the split between PMS and a separate counseling tool becomes a real problem as soon as a pharmacist needs to counsel a patient and can&#39;t pull the full medication history without switching systems. Two apps open simultaneously during counseling slows things down in ways that matter.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 21 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant



### Comment 4

&lt;p&gt;For a team of 11–50 people, I’d keep core counseling notes and patient history inside the PMS so pharmacists can see everything during dispensing. A separate tool can help with specialized programs, but the split becomes risky when documentation, follow-ups, or medication changes do not sync back reliably.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: Marketer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4