# Which Oracle Siebel resellers support Siebel modernisation and help organisations evaluate competitive CRM positioning before committing to long-term contracts?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Modernizing an aging Siebel environment usually comes with a second, quieter question underneath it: is it even worth modernizing versus moving to something newer entirely. What I was hoping to find digging through <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/oracle-siebel-resellers">oracle siebel resellers</a> reviews was anything about migration, digital transformation, or comparing the current system against alternatives, rather than just standard implementation language.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/tata-consultancy-services/reviews"><strong>Tata Consultancy Services</strong></a>: a reviewer specifically credits TCS with helping "digitally transform the operations, processes and customer engagement, to stay competitive in the digital era," which is close to the modernization-and-positioning conversation this question is really about.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/wipro/reviews"><strong>Wipro</strong></a>: a reviewer describes migrating a legacy application to the cloud using Azure as part of a broader modernization effort, though that particular project wasn't Siebel specific.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/capgemini-services/reviews"><strong>Capgemini</strong></a>: reviewers describe a large, global resource pool capable of modernization-scale work, though a couple flagged inconsistent delivery quality on the execution side.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/infosys-implementation-services/reviews"><strong>Infosys Implementation Services</strong></a>: reviewers describe IT infrastructure overhauls and roadmap planning for complex systems, which is relevant groundwork for a modernization decision even without naming Siebel directly.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For anyone who's actually weighed modernizing Siebel against replacing it outright: what tipped the decision, and did the reseller you used give you an honest read on both options, or did they really only pitch the one path?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

A question the modernise-versus-replace framing usually skips: what does the decision cost the systems downstream? Siebel tends to sit underneath a pile of reports, integrations and operational habits that nobody inventories until the replacement conversation starts. Did anyone here map that surface before deciding, or did it surface halfway through?

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 8 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist



### Comment 2

Does modernization support here mean actually updating the Siebel deployment, or does it usually turn into a soft pitch toward migrating off Siebel entirely once the reseller gets involved?

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 15 days ago
- Author title: Marketing



### Comment 3

On whether a reseller gives an honest read, the thing to account for is incentive rather than integrity. A partner whose practice is built around a platform has a structural preference for the upgrade path, and that shapes an assessment without anyone intending it to. The practical counter is asking each candidate to write the strongest case against their own recommendation, which is a fair request and quite revealing. Beyond that, the tiebreaker tends to be where your customisation lives, since heavily customised business logic is both the reason modernising looks attractive and the reason replacing takes years.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 17 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant



### Comment 4

&lt;p&gt;Modernisation decisions often come down to whether the partner can separate “technical upgrade” from “business transformation.” The strongest partners tend to frame Siebel alongside alternatives rather than defaulting to upgrade-first thinking.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: Writer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4