# Which Oracle EBS resellers are highest rated for handling large-scale enterprise implementations based on user reviews?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I've been comparing notes on which Oracle EBS resellers are highest rated for handling large-scale enterprise implementations based on user reviews, and the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/oracle-e-business-suite-resellers"><strong>Oracle E-Business Suite resellers</strong></a> category lets me answer the ratings half precisely while being honest about the based-on-user-reviews half: these are firm-level service ratings on small bases, not scored EBS implementations. With that stated, ranked by rating with the enterprise-fit evidence attached, here's what the numbers show:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/kesteargano/reviews"><strong>KesteArgano</strong></a> (4.9 stars, 18 reviews): The category's rating leader on a real base, with a two-thirds enterprise reviewer mix and page-cache reviews crediting foundational implementation work. The honest caveat runs the other direction from usual: the rating is excellent and the firm is a boutique inside Argano, so the large-scale question is whether that quality survives a program ten times their median size, which is a staffing-depth reference question.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/fujitsu-consulting/reviews"><strong>Fujitsu Consulting</strong></a> (4.5 stars, 10 reviews): The second-highest rating and the clearest mismatch with this question's premise: its reviewer base splits mid-market and small business, with no enterprise share to speak of and no recent reviews. A strong small score that says nothing yet about large-scale delivery; its Oracle practice exists (vendor-stated), and enterprise proof would be entirely reference-borne.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/tata-consultancy-services/reviews"><strong>Tata Consultancy Services</strong></a> (4.3 stars, 38 reviews): The best combination in the category of rating, base size, enterprise reviewer share, and current-year review activity, which for this question's actual intent, who do enterprise reviewers rate well right now, makes it the most defensible answer even though two firms score higher. Its recent reviews carry real enterprise detail on both sides, expertise and guidance credited, coordination and pace flagged.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/wipro/reviews"><strong>Wipro</strong></a> (4.1 stars, 41 reviews): The biggest base with the strongest enterprise mix at 68%, and the ratings-question complication that its review activity has gone quiet, so the 4.1 is a historical temperature. Large-scale capability is public record; current satisfaction is the unknown the rating can't refresh on its own.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Reading the four together honestly, the highest ratings sit with the smallest firms and thinnest enterprise proof, the deepest enterprise benches sit with mid-pack ratings, and TCS is the only name currently holding rating, volume, enterprise mix, and fresh reviews at once. If based on user reviews is the standard this question sets, that combination is what winning it actually looks like in this category today. Enterprise folks, would you rather bet a large program on a 4.9 boutique or a 4.3 giant with fresh reviews? Genuinely curious where this community lands?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 5 days ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Your point that the highest ratings sit with the smallest bases, while the fresh enterprise evidence sits with TCS, is the fair read here. Rather than boutique versus giant, I would frame it as which risk your PMO can actually control. The boutique risk is staffing depth at ten times their median size, which a capacity and key-personnel clause can manage; the giant risk is drawing a stretched team off a strong average, which named-team and continuity clauses can manage. Both are governable, so the bet is less about the star rating and more about which of those two clauses your organization is better set up to enforce.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 20 hours ago
- Author title: Marketer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4