# Which .NET IDE tools have the strongest user adoption rates with minimal team training requirements?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">A .NET IDE only pays off if the whole team actually adopts it and can pick it up without heavy training. So, for the .NET developers and reviewers here: which <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/net-integrated-development-environments-ide">.NET IDE tools</a> have the strongest user adoption rates with minimal team training requirements? By adoption and low training, three stand out (G2 ratings in parenthesis):</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/visual-studio/reviews"><strong>Visual Studio</strong></a> (4.5, 3,990+ reviews): the most widely adopted .NET IDE by a wide margin, and since most .NET developers learned on it, an existing team needs close to zero training. But it’s Windows-only now, so a cross-platform team cannot standardize on it.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/visual-studio-code/reviews"><strong>Visual Studio Code</strong></a> (4.7, 2,710+ reviews) with the C# Dev Kit: hugely adopted across all developers and simple enough that new hires get productive quickly, with the same tool on any operating system. But it’s an editor plus extensions, so for deep .NET work some teams still reach for a full IDE, and on G2 it lives in the code editor category, not this one.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/rider/reviews"><strong>JetBrains Rider</strong></a> (4.4, 75+ reviews): smaller adoption here but rated highly, and its smart hints and refactorings flatten the learning curve, especially for anyone already using JetBrains tools. But the layout differs from Visual Studio, so a switching team needs a short adjustment.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For those who reviewed or rolled one of these out, which one usually needs the least training to get everyone productive, and which one do people quietly stop using?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Low training requirements usually means the IDE follows conventions a .NET developer already expects rather than inventing its own way of doing things. That familiarity matters more for adoption speed than any single feature.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 4 days ago
- Author title: Marketing



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;The dual-tool point makes me think adoption is better measured through actual project activity than training time. I’d look at which IDE developers are still committing, debugging, and running tests from after a few months. A tool can be installed across the team and require almost no training, yet still be the secondary environment everyone quietly stops opening.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 7 days ago
- Author title: Writer



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;Visual Studio usually needs the least training for an established .NET team because most developers already know the workflow. VS Code is the one I’d expect people to drift away from for heavier .NET work if extensions start feeling like extra setup rather than a simpler environment.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 8 days ago
- Author title: Marketer



### Comment 4

&lt;p&gt;Least training is Visual Studio for the simple reason you named: most .NET developers learned on it, so there&#39;s nothing to teach. The one people quietly stop using is almost always the second tool in a dual setup. Teams adopt Rider or VS Code alongside Visual Studio, and whichever one isn&#39;t wired into the debug workflow they actually rely on just fades out of the dock within a quarter.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4