# Which MEP tools maintain ease of setup and performance when handling large, complex project files?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For the MEP folks here: which MEP tools maintain ease of setup and performance when handling large, complex project files?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">On big jobs, the tool that feels effortless on a small model is often the first to crawl once the file gets huge, so ease of setup and large-file performance tend to pull against each other. Pulling from G2's<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/mep"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/mep">MEP</a> category, three worth weighing:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/revit-mep/reviews"><strong>Revit MEP</strong></a>: the standard for large coordinated models, though it really only stays workable at scale through worksets and linked models. A heavy multi-discipline file can still get sluggish without that discipline.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/autocad-mep/reviews"><strong>AutoCAD MEP</strong></a>: lighter to set up and quick on drafting-led work, but it is 2D-first, so that speed comes at the cost of a fully coordinated model.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/h2x/reviews"><strong>h2x</strong></a>: a newer cloud tool that opens in a browser and stays fast, but it sidesteps the big-file problem by focusing on plumbing and hydronics rather than the whole building.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For teams on genuinely large projects, which held its speed, and what habits (worksets, splitting by level) made the difference?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Revit MEP would be my pick for genuinely large, coordinated projects, but I think model-management habits are what ultimately preserve performance. Splitting disciplines into linked models and using worksets deliberately would make the biggest difference rather than expecting one increasingly heavy model to stay fast on its own.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 8 hours ago



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;From teams on genuinely large jobs, the consistent answer is that Revit holds its speed exactly as long as the model hygiene does. Worksets by discipline, links split by level, and a regular purge-and-audit cadence matter more than the hardware. When someone skips that discipline, the file crawls and the tool gets blamed. AutoCAD MEP feeling fast is partly survivorship: the jobs that stay on it are the ones that never grow the heavy coordinated model in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4