# Which load balancers integrate seamlessly with AWS and Kubernetes-based infrastructure?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I'm comparing load balancers on how well they fit AWS and Kubernetes-based infrastructure, based on reviews. From the<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/load-balancing"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/load-balancing">load balancing</a> category:</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/f5-nginx-ingress-controller/reviews"><strong>F5 NGINX Ingress Controller</strong></a>: reviewers call it a default in the Kubernetes world for ingress, SSL termination, and routing. Did it hold up across your clusters?</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/traefik/reviews"><strong>Traefik</strong></a>: automatic service discovery for Docker and Kubernetes reviewers use as an entry point for EKS. Did dynamic config reduce your manual work?</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/aws-elastic-load-balancing/reviews"><strong>AWS Elastic Load Balancing</strong></a>: tight integration with EC2, ECS, EKS, and Lambda. Did it slot into your AWS setup without extra glue?</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/haproxy/reviews"><strong>HAProxy</strong></a>: works well in Docker and Kubernetes, though one reviewer wanted stronger Kubernetes-native service discovery. Did it fit your K8s workflow?</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For AWS and Kubernetes teams, which integrated cleanly without custom plumbing? And where did you hit gaps in service discovery or dynamic config?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 1 month ago
- Author title: Marketer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;For AWS and Kubernetes environments, the strongest fit is usually the option that understands dynamic infrastructure without forcing you to maintain a separate configuration layer. I’d compare native EKS integration, service discovery, certificate handling, and how automatically routing updates as pods and services change.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 1 month ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4