# Which event networking and matchmaking platforms integrate seamlessly with marketing automation platforms for post-event follow-up?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hi G2 community,</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/zuddl/reviews"><strong>Zuddl</strong></a> is the one I'd put at the top, if post-event follow-up through your marketing stack is the priority. A marketing and sales ops director described it outperforming other platforms specifically on Salesforce sync, and another reviewer called the HubSpot connection "native" rather than a bolted-on workaround. One caveat from a recent review: the Marketo integration still has gaps around custom statuses.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/bigmarker/reviews"><strong>BigMarker</strong></a> is a reasonable second option. Reviewers describe using it alongside HubSpot and Salesforce to streamline workflows, though one flagged occasional Salesforce sync issues and another wanted smoother third-party connections for post-event handoff specifically.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I'll be straight about a gap in the data: I couldn't find recent vFairs or Airmeet reviews naming a specific marketing automation tool. That's not proof they're weak here, just that the review evidence doesn't back a claim either way, so I'd ask both vendors directly about HubSpot or Marketo connectors before assuming.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Which marketing automation platform are you syncing into, and is it the CRM sync or the actual follow-up sequencing that matters more for your team?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

The field that makes post-event follow-up genuinely differentiated is attendance rather than registration, and it is the one most integrations drop. Knowing someone registered tells you they were interested in the event. Knowing they sat through the technical session and took two meetings tells you what to say to them, and that behavioural layer is what the earlier comment is right to insist on. Zuddl&#39;s Salesforce and HubSpot sync being described as native rather than bolted on is worth testing specifically on session-level data. Worth asking to see the actual field list that lands in your CRM, not just that a connector exists.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 3 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant



### Comment 2

The follow-up integration is the part everyone nods at during the sale and nobody tests until the event&#39;s over and the leads are stale. What matters isn&#39;t &quot;has a HubSpot logo on the page,&quot; it&#39;s whether the networking data (who met whom, who scanned what) actually flows into your automation as usable fields you can trigger on. A CSV export you upload Monday morning is not an integration. Which specific marketing platform are you feeding, and do you need the behavioral data or just the contact list? That decides whether this is solved or a manual slog.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4