# Which antivirus gives the strongest ransomware protection for a small home office setup where losing files would be genuinely catastrophic?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hi G2. When files are irreplaceable and losing them would be genuinely catastrophic, ransomware protection for a small home office is really two jobs: stopping the attack, and being able to recover if something slips through. I leaned toward products that do both, drawn from the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/antivirus">Antivirus</a> category, and here are the tools that stood out to me:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/threatdown/reviews"><strong>ThreatDown</strong></a> (4.6/5, 1,088 reviews) builds on nearly two decades of Malwarebytes anti-ransomware work, and reviewers describe it stopping targeted ransomware outright. Its built-in ransomware rollback is the standout here, letting you recover encrypted files rather than just blocking the attack.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/webroot-business-endpoint-protection/reviews"><strong>Webroot Business Endpoint Protection</strong></a> (4.5/5, 532 reviews) offers journaling and rollback remediation that reviewers value for returning drives to their pre-infection state, which is exactly the safety net a catastrophic-loss scenario calls for.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/kaspersky-anti-ransomware-tool/reviews"><strong>Kaspersky Anti-Ransomware Tool</strong></a> (4.4/5, 45 reviews) is a free, lightweight, behavior-based ransomware blocker that reviewers say runs alongside your existing antivirus without conflict. One former ransomware victim called it real peace of mind. Note the same reputational questions that follow Kaspersky apply here too.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/acronis-acronis-cyber-protect/reviews"><strong>Acronis Cyber Protect</strong></a> (4.3/5, 742 reviews) takes the backup-first route, combining antivirus with backup and one-click recovery so that if the worst happens you restore from a clean copy. Reviewers love the all-in-one approach, though a few note it can feel complex and heavier on older machines.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For a "losing files would be a disaster" setup, honestly the winning move is layered: strong real-time blocking plus a genuine backup or rollback you've actually tested. Have you had to recover from ransomware, and did rollback or a separate backup save you? And is anyone here running a dedicated backup tool alongside their AV?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago
- Author title: Marketer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;G2&#39;s antivirus reviews skew business and enterprise, names like ThreatDown, so for a genuinely small home office setup, the well-known consumer names with strong ransomware protection, Bitdefender, Norton 360, are usually the more relevant comparison, worth checking their current consumer reviews directly rather than enterprise-security ratings.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 11 days ago



### Comment 2

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;One detail decides whether a backup actually saves you: whether the ransomware can reach it. A drive that&#39;s plugged in, or a cloud folder syncing continuously, gets encrypted alongside everything else, and plenty of people discover their backup faithfully replicated the encrypted versions. So the requirement is offline or immutable rather than merely present, meaning versioned cloud storage with retention you can&#39;t delete, or a drive you physically unplug. Acronis pairing antivirus with backup and one-click recovery is the right shape for a home office precisely because it removes the step people skip, and testing one restore is what turns it from a plan into a safety net.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 12 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant



### Comment 3

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;background-color: transparent; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);&quot;&gt;ThreatDown&#39;s rollback actually got tested for us once when a few files got encrypted before real-time blocking caught up, and rollback brought them back without needing to touch a separate backup that time.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 14 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer



### Comment 4

I&#39;d add a caution from the recovery stories: rollback features get praised right up until the encryption event is bigger than the rollback cache, which is why a separate backup keeps coming up as the thing that actually saved files. If losing files is catastrophic, I&#39;d treat the AV choice as the second decision and a tested offline or cloud backup as the first. The AV that blocks 99 percent still leaves the last percent to your backup.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 2 months ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4