# What's the best Pegasystems consulting partner for change management and end-user training capabilities?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Change management and training are where a lot of Pega rollouts quietly succeed or fail, so I looked at which <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/pegasystems-consulting">Pegasystems consulting</a> partners reviewers associate with the people side, not just the build.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/pwc-pwc/reviews"><strong>PwC</strong></a>: Reviewers highlight methodology, organization and a professional, structured approach, which is the backbone of good change management. Best for transformations where adoption and process change are as big as the tech.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/tata-consultancy-services/reviews"><strong>Tata Consultancy Services</strong></a>: Reviewers note knowledgeable people who guide next steps and help navigate business problems, useful for hand-holding through change. Best for large user populations needing sustained support.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Honestly, ask any partner to show their actual training and adoption plan, not just slideware, since that's where change programs thin out. For those who've done a Pega rollout, what made end users actually embrace it?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 17 days ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Both of these descriptions are proxies for change-management strength rather than actual evidence of it, worth naming since that gap matters a lot for this specific question. &quot;Structured, organized methodology&quot; and &quot;knowledgeable people who guide next steps&quot; both describe how professionally the consulting engagement itself runs, not whether end users at the client organization actually adopted the new system afterward. Those are two different populations, the consultants being reviewed and the end users who&#39;d have to change their actual behavior, and a firm scoring well on the first doesn&#39;t necessarily say anything about the second. The post&#39;s own suggestion, ask for the actual training and adoption plan rather than slideware, is really the only way to get evidence on the part that matters, since the reviews here are describing engagement quality, not adoption outcomes.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 14 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4