# What .NET IDE solutions offer the fastest implementation path and shortest time to value for development teams?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For most teams, time to value is not about typing speed, it is about how fast you go from a new project to something that builds, runs, and ships. So, for the .NET developers and reviewers here: what <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/net-integrated-development-environments-ide">.NET IDE solutions</a> offer the fastest implementation path and shortest time to value for development teams? The realistic current options, and how each shortens that path:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/visual-studio/reviews"><strong>Visual Studio</strong></a>: the fastest path for a Windows team that already knows it. Its large set of project templates and scaffolding spins up common app types (web APIs, MVC, desktop, worker services) in a few clicks, with build, run, and debug wired up out of the box. But the install is heavy, and it is Windows-only now.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/rider/reviews"><strong>JetBrains Rider</strong></a>: fast to get productive across Windows, macOS, and Linux, with a bundled runtime so setup is light and smart assists that cut trial and error as you build. Free for non-commercial use. But coming from Visual Studio, the layout takes a short adjustment.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/visual-studio-code/reviews"><strong>Visual Studio Code</strong></a> with the C# Dev Kit: the quickest to install and open, and fine for getting a small .NET service running fast on any operating system. But as an editor with extensions, larger projects can need more manual wiring than a full IDE, and on G2 it sits in the code editor category, not this one.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For teams who reviewed or shipped something recently, which of these get teams from empty projects to first working releases the fastest?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;All three get you from empty project to running-locally fast, the templates have made that a solved problem. The gap opens between running locally and first release, because that mile is pipeline, not editor. If the destination is Azure, Visual Studio has the shortest path since publish and deployment live in the IDE. Anywhere else, the IDE matters less than how quickly you can wire CI, and that&#39;s tooling-neutral.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4