# What MEP software avoids automation features that create unexpected snapping or unwanted modifications during design work?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Question for the designers here who have ever watched a pipe route itself somewhere it should not go. I am trying to find out which MEP software avoids automation that creates unexpected snapping or unwanted modifications during design work, because the<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/mep"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/mep">MEP</a> category is full of tools that want to help before being asked.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">One framing first, tell me if it matches your experience: the problem is not automation itself. It is automation that touches your geometry uninvited. Calculation automation saves hours. Auto-routing that grabs your elbow mid-drag costs them back.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/autocad-mep/reviews"><strong>AutoCAD MEP</strong></a> is best known for keeping the drafting manual first. Snaps and system connections exist, but they behave like classic AutoCAD, so you can toggle them and they mostly stay where you put them. Does that hold in dense models too?</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/revit-mep/reviews"><strong>Revit MEP</strong></a> is the one people usually complain about here, and also the one reviewers rate highest overall. Auto-connect and routing assumptions are baked into how it thinks. For daily users: which settings actually tame it?</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/design-master-electrical/reviews"><strong>Design Master Electrical</strong></a> takes the split-the-difference route. It runs inside AutoCAD and automates the calculations and cross-sheet updates, while your linework stays yours. Is that the right balance, or does it leave too much manual work?</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">What is the automation moment that actually ruined an afternoon for you, and in which tool?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 5 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The stories I&#39;ve collected from drafters all share one shape: the automation that hurts isn&#39;t the one that grabs your elbow mid-drag, it&#39;s the one that edits something offscreen and you find it three sheets later. Revit&#39;s auto-connect rerouting a branch you weren&#39;t looking at is the classic. Which is an argument for your Design Master framing: automate the calculations, which are checkable, and leave the geometry alone.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 3 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4