# What MEP platforms allow teams to build and maintain custom block libraries efficiently for repeated project use?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For the MEP folks whose firms live off repeat project types, this one is for you. I am looking for which MEP platforms let a team build and maintain custom block libraries efficiently for repeated use, since rebuilding the same content every project is a quiet, expensive waste. Browsing the<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/mep"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/mep">MEP</a> category, every platform says "content library." Here is what I think that has to mean:</p><ul>
<li>Creating a custom item once, without a specialist</li>
<li>Sharing one library across the whole team, with updates in one place</li>
<li>Content that carries data, not just geometry</li>
<li>Surviving a version upgrade without a rebuild weekend</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">How the shortlist handles it:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/autocad-mep/reviews"><strong>AutoCAD MEP</strong></a> is where "block" language comes from, and it is still the easiest place to build and reuse your own content through blocks and tool palettes. The limit: blocks are mostly geometry, light on data.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/revit-mep/reviews"><strong>Revit MEP</strong></a> replaces blocks with families, which carry real data and update everywhere at once. The honest trade: building good families takes skill, and many teams end up hiring or training for it.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/trimble-sysque/reviews"><strong>Trimble SysQue</strong></a> flips the question. It runs inside Revit and brings a database of over eight million manufacturer parts, so the library is mostly maintained for you, at fabrication-level detail.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">So which approach wins over five years: building your own blocks, investing in families, or renting a maintained library? What has your firm actually stuck with?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 4 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Over five years, data beats geometry, so the real contest is families versus the rented library. Blocks feel cheapest and quietly cost the most, since geometry-only content means retyping the same data forever. The tiebreaker is what your deliverable is: firms handing off design intent do fine investing in families and a content owner, while anyone producing fabrication-level work ends up renting, because maintaining eight million parts yourself isn&#39;t a hobby. The hidden line item either way is the person who owns the library. Content without an owner rots by version three.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 3 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4