# What implementation timeline and disruption risk do teams face with quote to cash consulting engagements in regulated industries?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Regulated industries add approval layers that generic <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/quote-to-cash-consulting">quote to cash consulting</a> timelines don't account for, so I'd set expectations firm by firm rather than trust a standard project plan.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/deloitte-consulting/reviews"><strong>Deloitte Consulting</strong></a> (4.2/5, 66 reviews). Strong on the compliance and advisory side, but reviewers explicitly call out turnaround slowing "when multiple approvals are involved," which regulated organizations should plan for rather than treat as a red flag.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/pwc-pwc/reviews"><strong>PwC</strong></a> (4.2/5, 38 reviews). Similar profile; cost is the more consistent complaint here than timeline, so budget risk may matter more than schedule risk with this firm.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-consulting/reviews"><strong>IBM Consulting</strong></a> (4.0/5, 65 reviews). One reviewer praised reliable, achievable implementation timelines on SAP-adjacent work, but another flagged decision-making slowing on larger projects, worth asking directly which pattern applies to a regulated-industry scope.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/atg-consulting-a-cognizant-company/reviews"><strong>ATG Consulting</strong></a> (4.6/5, 27 reviews). A reviewer in a regulated context described timeline extensions tied to CPQ platform changes after a vendor acquisition, a reminder that disruption risk isn't only about the consulting firm's own pace.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Takeaway: build approval-layer time into the plan upfront rather than negotiating it away in the statement of work. Every firm above has reviewers describing exactly that friction.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For teams that have been through this: did the disruption come more from the consulting firm's pace or your own internal approval chain?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 16 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The ATG note about timeline extensions from CPQ platform changes after a vendor acquisition is a risk that doesn&#39;t get written into project plans often enough. Platform roadmap risk is separate from consulting firm pace but ends up on the same timeline, and regulated industries have less flexibility to absorb it. Building a contingency specifically for platform-side delays rather than only internal approval delays seems worth doing.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 16 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4