# What customization and integration capabilities do the leading Oracle EBS resellers offer for complex legacy environments?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I've been comparing notes on what customization and integration capabilities do the leading Oracle EBS resellers offer for complex legacy environments, and the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/oracle-e-business-suite-resellers"><strong>Oracle E-Business Suite resellers</strong></a> category answers this mostly through provider positioning rather than review text, since integration war stories don't get written up in firm-level service reviews. So the list below sorts by how specifically each provider's stated capabilities match legacy-environment work, with the verification path for each. Here's the short list:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/ast-corporation/reviews"><strong>AST Corporation</strong></a>: The most specific fit on paper: its entire G2 identity is Oracle E-Business Suite integrator (vendor-stated), which for a complex legacy estate is the specialization this question is asking for. No review evidence exists either way, so the capability check is entirely reference-based: ask for two clients whose EBS instance carries customization volume like yours.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/chainsys/reviews"><strong>ChainSys</strong></a>: The data-layer specialist: positioned entirely on data migration products and solutions (vendor-stated), which in legacy EBS work is where projects actually stall, moving decades of customized data without breaking it. A reseller candidate that partners with or matches this capability deserves points; ask every candidate who does their data migration and with what tooling.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/tata-consultancy-services/reviews"><strong>Tata Consultancy Services</strong></a>: The generalist with recent evidence of the behavior legacy work needs: client reviews describe knowledgeable people helping navigate what to do next when problems surface, which is the daily reality of untangling old customizations. The offshore coordination con in the same review base matters double in legacy work, where context lives in a few heads; contract for continuity of the people who learn your estate.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/centroid/reviews"><strong>Centroid</strong></a>: The infrastructure-side integrator: Oracle workload expertise across every major cloud plus managed services (vendor-stated), relevant when the legacy complexity includes where EBS runs, not just how it's customized. Single-review base, so vendor claims plus references again.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For complex legacy environments, the capability question decomposes into three that no G2 listing answers: who inventories your existing customizations and how, what's their position on retire-versus-rebuild for each one, and how do they test integrations against systems that have no documentation. Put those three to every candidate in writing; the quality of the written answers is itself the capability evidence this category can't give you. What's the ugliest customization in your EBS estate, and did any partner actually handle it well rather than proposing to rebuild everything?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 5 days ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;This is a strong way to frame legacy work, since the hardest part is usually understanding what already exists before touching it. The signal I would add is commercial sequencing: providers who begin with a scoped assessment engagement, priced on its own, tend to preserve and refactor selectively, while a proposal that moves straight to a full rebuild often reflects a preference for a clean slate over the harder analysis.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 1 day ago
- Author title: Marketer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4