# What ASC 606 compliance consulting and revenue accounting transformation services are available for organizations evaluating their QTC process?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">ASC 606 work is accounting policy, not just system configuration, so I'd point this toward firms with real audit and advisory roots rather than pure CPQ implementers. A few names on the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/quote-to-cash-consulting">quote to cash consulting</a> list carry that background.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/deloitte-consulting/reviews"><strong>Deloitte Consulting</strong></a> (4.2/5, 66 reviews). Big 4 audit, tax, and advisory roots make this the most natural fit for revenue recognition policy work itself, not just the software behind it. Reviewers flag it as one of the pricier options, and some note engagements sublet third-party technical resources.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/pwc-pwc/reviews"><strong>PwC</strong></a> (4.2/5, 38 reviews). Similar Big 4 positioning. One reviewer specifically credited PwC's team with cost optimization and timely delivery, though cost complaints show up here too: "very costly, charges a lot for small amount of work."</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/ibm-consulting/reviews"><strong>IBM Consulting</strong></a> (4.0/5, 65 reviews). Better suited when ASC 606 work is bundled with an ERP or integration project rather than standalone accounting policy; one reviewer praised reliable implementation timelines on SAP-adjacent work.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/capgemini-services/reviews"><strong>Capgemini Services</strong></a> (3.9/5, 26 reviews). A Salesforce-adjacent implementation option, but its recent review base leans employee perspective rather than client feedback, so I'd confirm directly with references before counting on it here.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Takeaway: if the ask is about revenue recognition policy and disclosure itself, start with Deloitte or PwC; if ASC 606 is wrapped inside a broader system rebuild, IBM Consulting earns a seat at the table.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Has anyone paired a Big 4 firm for the accounting policy piece with a separate implementation partner for the system side? Did that split work cleanly or create its own handoff problems?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 17 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The question about pairing a Big 4 firm for the accounting policy piece with a separate implementation partner for the system side is one I&#39;ve been wrestling with too. In practice the handoff tends to create problems at exactly the point where policy interpretation should be driving configuration decisions, which is the moment neither firm is fully accountable. Curious whether anyone has successfully structured the SOW to make one party own that intersection.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 17 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4