# What Are the Best Third-Party & Supplier Risk Management Solutions for Non-Technical Teams?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Not every team evaluating a <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/third-party-supplier-risk-management">Third Party &amp; Supplier Risk Management</a> tool has a dedicated security analyst on staff, so ease of setup and day-to-day usability tend to matter as much as depth of feature set. A few platforms stand out specifically for how approachable they are to non-technical users.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/vanta/reviews"><strong>Vanta</strong></a>: reviewers repeatedly point to automated evidence collection, cutting the manual work that would otherwise fall on a compliance generalist rather than a security specialist, with several small teams saying it let them get audit-ready without hiring for the role.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/creditsafe/reviews"><strong>Creditsafe</strong></a>: users describe it as intuitive enough that credit checks that used to take real research time now happen in a few clicks, with everything from payment history to legal filings surfaced in one place.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/upguard-vendor-risk/reviews"><strong>UpGuard Vendor Risk</strong></a>: reviewers specifically call out how quickly a first-time user can get oriented, with one noting it takes about five minutes to start navigating comfortably, plus a dedicated onboarding contact that helped smooth initial setup.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/secureframe/reviews"><strong>Secureframe</strong></a>: multiple reviewers mention using it specifically because they lack an in-house compliance hire, with built-in templates and a named success manager walking them through what SOC 2 actually requires.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">The common thread across all four is automation that removes manual steps rather than adding configuration for the user to manage, which tends to be what actually makes a tool workable for a team without a dedicated security background.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">If you are running vendor risk without a security specialist on staff, which of these (or others) made the biggest difference once you got past initial setup?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 1 day ago
- Author title: Marketing
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;For a non-technical team, I’d look at what still requires interpretation after the automation runs. A tool can collect evidence and flag risks well, but if someone still needs deep security expertise to decide what actually matters, the workload hasn’t really disappeared.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 1 day ago
- Author title: Marketer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4