# What are the best clinical trial management systems for sites running several studies with a small coordinating team?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Hi, site coordinators and research managers on G2, especially the ones covering four studies with two people and a shared calendar.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I would value a read on the best<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/clinical-trial-management-systems"> </a><a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/clinical-trial-management-systems">clinical trial management systems</a> for sites running several studies with a small coordinating team, from people doing the coordinating rather than the selecting. Three that come up most:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/florence-healthcare-florence-ebinders/reviews"><strong>Florence eBinders</strong></a> (4.5) replaces paper regulatory binders with a cloud eISF, with version control, audit trails and remote monitor access, which reviewers say removes on-site visits and keeps the site inspection-ready. The same reviewers are candid that it is highly customisable, so setup and template building take real time and continuing oversight.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/viedoc/reviews"><strong>Viedoc</strong></a> (4.5) spans EDC, CTMS and eTMF in one suite, which suits sites that would rather learn one interface across studies. Reviewers describe it as intuitive for site staff, with less flexibility on very complex study designs and a cost that can feel high on small early-phase work.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/clinical-research-suite/reviews"><strong>Clinical Research Suite</strong></a> (3.8) is widely reviewed and sits across CTMS, EDC and regulatory information management for sites wanting one vendor.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For small teams: what still gets tracked in a spreadsheet next to the system, and why has nothing replaced it?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 28 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

Viedoc covering EDC, CTMS and eTMF in one suite makes sense for small teams who&#39;d rather learn a single interface across studies. Florence eBinders keeping a site inspection-ready is a nice bonus.

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 7 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4