# What application shielding platforms offer runtime protection that deploys quickly with minimal integration effort for a startup or small team?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I've been exploring <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/application-shielding">application shielding</a> platforms for a piece on what's actually practical for startups and small mobile teams, and the gap between "minimal integration effort" in marketing copy and what that means in practice for a three-person engineering team is often wide. Three platforms come up most from small and early-stage team reviewers where speed of deployment and low engineering overhead are the actual story: Appdome, DoveRunner, and LIAPP.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">What small team and startup reviewers actually say about deployment effort:</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/appdome/reviews"><strong>Appdome</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Small teams describe connecting it to their CI/CD pipeline with no source code changes required, with security protections activating automatically on every new build rather than needing a developer to reconfigure for each release.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/doverunner/reviews"><strong>DoveRunner</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Reviewers with small teams describe a no-code and low-code deployment path that protects APK and AAB files without needing to modify the app itself, and specifically call out the performance staying clean after protection is applied.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/liapp/reviews"><strong>LIAPP</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Small and mid-market teams describe the application time for security being meaningfully shortened compared to building protection in manually, with memory tampering prevention and anti-forgery controls active without extensive setup.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/preemptive/reviews"><strong>PreEmptive</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Reviewers with small development teams describe the initial setup as requiring some learning, but once integrated into the build pipeline it runs automatically without ongoing developer attention.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For startup teams specifically: was there a point where the integration effort turned out to be heavier than the vendor described upfront? And what was the thing that actually surprised you most about getting it into production?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;“Minimal effort” usually holds for the first integration, but gets interesting when it builds scale or edge cases show up. I’ve seen small teams underestimate that part. From what you’ve seen, where did the first real friction show up after initial setup?&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: about 2 months ago
- Author title: Writer





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4