# The Wild vs Cluster: which VR collaboration platform is better for distributed teams needing immersive presence?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">The Wild vs Cluster: which VR collaboration platform is better for distributed teams needing immersive presence? I set out to compare these two across the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/vr-collaboration"><strong>VR collaboration</strong></a> category for my own research, and I have to tell you what I found before any feature talk, because each side of this versus carries a caveat big enough to reshape the question, and I verified both this session. Here's the comparison as it honestly stands:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/the-wild/reviews"><strong>The Wild</strong></a> (4.7 stars, 43 reviews): On paper, the stronger product for professional teams: the category's largest credible base, historically excellent marks, and a purpose, AEC and design teams experiencing their work together with native SketchUp, Revit, and BIM360 support (vendor-stated). What I verified before writing this: it's been Autodesk-owned since 2022, Autodesk launched and actively markets Workshop XR, an immersive design-review workspace built from The Wild's technology and team, integrated with Autodesk's construction cloud, and Autodesk's own support materials pose the replacement question about The Wild directly, while The Wild's homepage itself banners the successor. I could not verify a formal end-of-life date, so I won't claim one; what I can say is that no review has landed on its G2 listing in at least a year, and any 2026 buyer's first question to Autodesk is whether this product is still sold, renewed, and developed, or whether the honest evaluation is Workshop XR wearing this product's inheritance.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/cluster/reviews"><strong>Cluster</strong></a> (4.4 stars, 13 reviews): On paper, the general-purpose half: easy virtual rooms for gatherings, events, and meetings (vendor-stated), which is closer to what a generic distributed team needs than an AEC design tool. What I found on its listing: the visible review evidence is partially contaminated, with recent entries describing unrelated products entirely, and listing metadata pointing at its help-desk host rather than the company. So its 4.4 can't be read at face value in either direction, and evaluating it honestly means ignoring the G2 noise and trialing the actual platform, which its own materials describe as genuinely easy to enter.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">So my verdict on the question as asked, with both caveats priced in: for the generic distributed team this question describes, neither product's current G2 evidence supports a confident pick, and the honest routing is by job. If your team is AEC and the immersive presence you need is standing inside your building models together, The Wild's lineage is exactly right, and the purchase conversation belongs with Autodesk about which product in that lineage you'd actually be buying in 2026. If your team needs general meeting and event presence, Cluster's shape fits better, contingent on a hands-on trial that its polluted listing can't substitute for, and I'd trial it alongside the business-meeting specialists in this category rather than alone. What I wouldn't do is decide between these two on their G2 ratings, because I've now read what's underneath both numbers, and neither is currently measuring what a 2026 buyer needs measured.</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 5 days ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;I&#39;ve been looking at this comparison and I think the more useful question is what your team actually does together, not which one scores higher. The Wild was built for AEC teams reviewing spatial models, and Cluster is closer to a general meeting and events tool. If your use case doesn&#39;t involve walking through building models, The Wild&#39;s strengths probably don&#39;t apply to you anyway.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 1 day ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4