# NEOGOV vs Watermark Faculty Success: which is better for faculty tracking and accreditation management?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">These two aren't really solving the same problem, so I'd frame it as a side-by-side rather than a single winner:</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/watermark-watermark-faculty-success/reviews"><strong>Watermark Faculty Success</strong></a> (4/5, 80 reviews, 95 satisfaction score): built specifically for faculty activity: teaching, research, service, and the reports that come out of that data for accreditation and annual review. Reviewers cite accreditation-ready tables and reports that save significant time during accreditation cycles, with roughly a third of its reviewer base at enterprise-size institutions.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/neogov-talent-management-suite/reviews"><strong>NEOGOV Talent Management Suite</strong></a> (4.3/5, 84 reviews, 62 satisfaction score): a broader HR and talent platform. Its higher-ed reviews focus on hiring and applicant tracking, like the reviewer who noted its higher-ed-specific features made hiring committees more efficient, not on faculty activity or accreditation, and most of its overall review base actually comes from government and public-sector HR teams.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">If accreditation and faculty-tracking are the actual job, Watermark's review base speaks to it directly. If you need recruiting, onboarding, and departmental hiring workflows, NEOGOV's evidence is stronger there, especially for institutions already running government-style hiring processes. Plenty of institutions run both side by side rather than treating this as an either-or decision.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Has anyone integrated the two, so faculty hiring in NEOGOV flows into Watermark once someone's on faculty, or does that handoff still happen manually between HR and faculty affairs?</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"></p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 10 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;Honestly these two aren&#39;t really competing for the same job, which makes the comparison easier than it looks. Watermark Faculty Success is purpose-built for faculty activity tracking, tenure and promotion, and accreditation reporting, that&#39;s its entire reason for existing, and reviewers use it for exactly AACSB-style reporting. NEOGOV is a talent management suite, recruiting, onboarding, HR lifecycle, and its reviewer base skews heavily to government and public-sector HR, not faculty activity or accreditation. So for faculty tracking and accreditation specifically, Watermark is the clear fit, and NEOGOV would be the pick if your gap is hiring and HR operations. Are you trying to solve both, because you might honestly end up needing one of each?&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 5 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4