# Is webmanuals actually worth it for Directors of Maintenance based on user reviews?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I've been trying to work out whether <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/webmanuals/reviews">webmanuals</a> is actually worth it for Directors of Maintenance based on user reviews in <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/aviation-document-distribution">aviation document distribution</a>, since the platform's strength seems to lean toward manual authoring and compliance monitoring specifically, which is a slightly different center of gravity than pure document access and distribution.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true"><strong>What matters most for a Director of Maintenance evaluating this:</strong></p><ul>
<li>Whether compliance tracking against EASA and FAA regulations genuinely reduces audit prep time</li>
<li>Whether the authoring and revision process holds up across multiple manuals and departments</li>
<li>Whether the platform integrates cleanly with existing corporate systems</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">What the reviews suggest on those points:</p><ul><li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/webmanuals/reviews"><strong>webmanuals</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Compliance libraries linking manual content directly to individual EASA and FAA rules are described as making audits significantly more time efficient, with one long-term user crediting the platform with cutting revision cycle time by several days. Automated tracking of document changes and revision history is repeatedly cited as a core strength. One reviewer specifically noted the system doesn't support SAML single sign-on, which makes integration with corporate security tools more difficult, a detail worth raising directly with IT before rollout.</li></ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For Directors of Maintenance who have run webmanuals across multiple manuals or departments: did the compliance library structure hold up as your regulatory requirements got more complex, or did you find yourself needing workarounds?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 30 days ago
- Author title: Marketing Executive
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The lack of SAML single sign-on support is worth raising with IT early rather than discovering it during rollout. Otherwise the compliance library tied to specific EASA and FAA rules sounds like a genuinely useful structure for cutting down audit prep time.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 29 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: over 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4