# Is Diabolocom worth it for contact center payments?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">I've spent a while inside the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/contact-center-payments"><strong>contact center payments</strong></a> category for my own evaluation, and the question I promised a colleague I'd answer properly is this one: Is Diabolocom worth it for contact center payments? I pulled everything G2 currently holds on it plus its live pricing page, and the honest answer requires splitting the product from the question, because I found strong evidence for one and almost none for the other:</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/diabolocom/reviews"><strong>Diabolocom</strong></a> (4.3 stars, 34 reviews): What the current evidence supports: as a contact center platform, its recent reviews are active and substantive, seven in the last twelve months, crediting dialer reliability with minimal downtime, rich configuration once learned, Salesforce CTI with call tracking in the CRM, swift deployments carried by responsive and attentive support, its own telecom infrastructure delivering stable networking, and European data residency with internally hosted AI, which several reviewers explicitly value. The same reviews carry the costs: real configuration complexity, with simple things requiring many objects and occasional developer help, published starting prices of $60 per named license for voice and $99 for omnichannel (verified live, starting-at), reporting limitations, criticism of P1 incident support against otherwise-praised support, and one blunt three-star review saying technical promises weren't kept on obvious functions.</li>
<li>What the current evidence does not support, and this is the crux for the question as asked: payments. Not one of those seven recent reviews describes taking a payment, its G2 description doesn't mention payment processing, and its presence in this category rests on platform capability rather than documented payment workflows. I looked for the payment evidence specifically because the question demands it, and on G2 today it isn't there. That's not an accusation of absence in the product; it's an absence in the proof, and a buyer for payments specifically should treat it exactly that way.</li>
<li>So the worth-it splits cleanly in my read: if your actual purchase is a European cloud contact center, with sovereignty, native telephony, and CRM depth as the drivers, and phone payments are one workflow among many, Diabolocom is worth evaluating on its genuinely solid recent platform evidence, with the payment workflow made a demo condition: a live card payment end to end, the PCI scope documentation your acquirer will ask for, and a reference customer collecting payments on it today. If instead your purchase is payments first, a compliant way to take cards on the phones you already run, then the honest answer is that Diabolocom is the wrong shape for the question, this category's payment-layer products exist for precisely that job, and no current G2 evidence argues otherwise.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">My bottom line, plainly, is that Diabolocom is worth it as a contact center platform on its own recent record and unproven, on today's G2 evidence, as a payments purchase, and the three demo conditions above are how you convert unproven into either proven or declined without betting your compliance on a category badge. Is anyone actually collecting card payments through Diabolocom in production right now? A single first-hand account here would do what its entire G2 review base currently doesn't.</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 6 days ago
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The honest answer is that Diabolocom has solid reviews as a contact center platform, but the reviews don&#39;t actually describe payment collection. Not one. So if payments are the primary reason you&#39;re evaluating it, there&#39;s no user evidence to lean on, only vendor claims and category placement. Worth demanding a live end-to-end payment demo and asking for a reference customer who&#39;s actively collecting card payments through it, before treating it as a confirmed option for that use case.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 1 day ago
- Author title: SEO Content Specialist




## Related Product
[Diabolocom](https://www.g2.com/products/diabolocom/reviews)

## Related Category
[Contact Center](https://www.g2.com/categories/contact-center)

## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4