# Is a paid BIM objects platform worth it for a small architecture firm?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Most small architecture firms start with free resources, and the question is whether there comes a point at which a paid platform actually changes how the work gets done. The honest version of this is: free libraries can get you most of the way there on most projects. The gap tends to show up in specific project types and product categories, or when the time spent hunting for a decent family starts adding up to something measurable.</p><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">From small firm reviews in the <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/bim-objects">BIM objects</a> category, the platforms that come up most in cost-versus-value conversations are BIMobject, Bimstore, and BIMsmith.</p><ol>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/bimobject/reviews"><strong>BIMobject</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Free to use for specifiers and architects downloading content. Reviewers describe it as their first stop for Revit families, which means the value question for a small firm is not about cost but about whether it covers what you need. The consistent gaps reviewers mention are: content not available in RVT format, subcategories that are poorly organized, and search results that sometimes surface irrelevant objects. For a small firm, these are tolerable inefficiencies rather than dealbreakers.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/bimstore/reviews"><strong>Bimstore</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Free access with manufacturer-provided, validated content. Reviewers say they find what they need more reliably than on some larger, less curated platforms. One reviewer specifically described it as what they use when they want to trust the content without auditing it themselves. For a small firm without a dedicated BIM manager, that reliability trade-off matters more than it does at a larger practice where someone can verify families.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/bimsmith/reviews"><strong>BIMsmith</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Positions itself around manufacturer content alongside specification data. For small firms where the BIM object and the product specification need to stay connected, combining them into a single source is a real time-saver. Review count is limited on G2, so the picture is incomplete.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/magicad-cloud/reviews"><strong>MagiCAD Cloud</strong></a><strong>:</strong> The free tier covers roughly 25% of the library according to reviewer comments, with the full catalog requiring a subscription. For a small firm doing MEP-adjacent architecture or one that regularly specifies complex mechanical or electrical equipment, the paid tier is worth evaluating on the specific gap it fills. For a general architectural practice without heavy MEP content needs, the free alternatives may be sufficient.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/revit-city/reviews"><strong>Revit City</strong></a><strong>:</strong> Free and has a large community-contributed library. The honest reviewer assessment is that quality varies significantly, there is no manufacturer verification, and finding the right family requires patience. For a small firm, it is a useful supplement for generic families when manufacturer content is unavailable, but not a replacement for manufacturer-provided sources.</li>
</ol><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">For small firms that tried a paid platform and either stayed with it or went back to free: what specific project needed to be justified by the cost, or what made the free options good enough?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 6 days ago
- Author title: Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

The main libraries here are free to download from anyway, so the real cost of this was never the subscription, it&#39;s the time to vet and clean families to your standards, and that time doesn&#39;t go away when you pay. For a small firm without a BIM manager, the biggest lever isn&#39;t a bigger library, free or paid, it&#39;s building up a small, trusted set of go-to families once so you stop re-hunting and re-checking the same components every project, and then paying only for the narrow gap that set can&#39;t cover, usually something specialized like MEP. For small firms, once you&#39;d built up your own set of families, did a paid platform still earn its keep, or did the reused internal library cover most of it?



##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 3 days ago
- Author title: Tech Consultant





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4