# Concept3D vs Mappedin for campus wayfinding: which do facility managers find easier to keep updated as buildings change?

<p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">When I was researching <a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/categories/digital-wayfinding">digital wayfinding</a> on G2 for keeping a campus map current as buildings change, Concept3D is the better-evidenced choice, so I'd lead with it. Its higher-ed reviewers describe exactly this workflow, while Mappedin has only a handful of G2 reviews, so I'd judge it in a demo rather than on user evidence.</p><ul>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/concept3d/reviews"><strong>Concept3D</strong></a> (4.5 stars, 115 reviews): Facility and web teams update the map themselves with no coding and consolidate old static maps into one system they maintain. The one caveat from a large-campus admin is that wayfinding routes are drawn manually and can get tedious at scale, with some data duplicated between systems.</li>
<li>
<a class="a a--md" elv="true" href="https://www.g2.com/products/mappedin/reviews"><strong>Mappedin</strong></a> (4.5 stars, 5 reviews): Built around easy indoor map updates. Few G2 reviews and none specifically about campus update workflow, so I'd put it through a hands-on demo before trusting it at scale.</li>
</ul><p class="elv-tracking-normal elv-text-default elv-font-figtree elv-text-base elv-leading-base elv-font-normal" elv="true">Best way to settle it: demo both on your real scenario, add a building, reroute the paths, and time how long each takes. Facility managers who've used either, how painful was keeping it current as campus changed?</p>

##### Post Metadata
- Posted at: 16 days ago
- Author title: SEO Content Writer
- Net upvotes: 1


## Comments
### Comment 1

&lt;p&gt;The add-a-building test in your post is the right one, and I&#39;d add a wrinkle: ask each vendor to run it with your floor plans, not their polished demo campus. The 3D-render-first tools tend to look better and cost more per change, while the mapping-data-first tools update cheaper but flatter. Which pain you prefer depends on who&#39;s watching: admissions wants the render, facilities wants the cheap update. Whoever owns the budget after year one should make the call.&lt;/p&gt;

##### Comment Metadata
- Posted at: 11 days ago





## Related discussions
- [How well does Trello scale into a larger team?](https://www.g2.com/discussions/1-how-well-does-trello-scale-into-a-larger-team)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 6
- [Can we please add a new section](https://www.g2.com/discussions/2-can-we-please-add-a-new-section)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 0
- [Quantifiable benefits from implementing your CRM](https://www.g2.com/discussions/quantifiable-benefits-from-implementing-your-crm)
  - Posted at: about 13 years ago
  - Comments: 4