G2

Jessica M.

CTO

Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)

8/28/2026

"Powerful AI Browser Automation for Real-World Web Workflows"

4/5

What do you like best about TinyFish?

What I like most about TinyFish is how it lets AI agents interact with real websites and complete tasks through the browser instead of being limited to APIs or static data. This makes it especially useful for automating workflows that would normally require manually navigating websites, extracting information, and taking actions across different web services.

The biggest value for me is the combination of AI intelligence and browser automation. It allows me to turn a natural-language goal into an actionable workflow, which can significantly reduce repetitive work. I also like the potential for integrations because the same approach can be applied across websites without needing to build a custom integration for every individual service.

The overall experience makes TinyFish feel less like a simple scraping tool and more like infrastructure for building practical AI agents that can actually operate on the web. On a daily basis, TinyFish is incredibly smooth to integrate into our automated pipelines. The interface—whether using their REST API, TypeScript SDK, or CLI—is intuitive and cuts out the huge headache of managing browser servers, proxies, and anti-bot bypass mechanisms manually. The sub-250ms cold starts mean our agents execute web actions instantly without hanging. It provides a seamless, developer-friendly experience that removes the clunkiness of old web scraping stacks. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about TinyFish?

The main area I think TinyFish could improve is the learning curve around building and debugging more complex browser-agent workflows. The basic concept is powerful, but when an agent encounters an unexpected website state or a workflow fails midway, it would be helpful to have even more detailed debugging information and clearer visibility into exactly what the agent attempted.

I’d also like to see broader integrations, more examples for advanced use cases, and clearer guidance around performance and pricing as workflows scale. These improvements would make it easier to move from experimenting with TinyFish to confidently using it in production. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is TinyFish solving and how is that benefiting you?

TinyFish solves the problem of automating web-based tasks that would normally require manually navigating websites or building separate integrations for every service. Instead of relying entirely on APIs, I can use AI agents to interact with real websites, retrieve information, and carry out multi-step workflows.

This benefits me because I work on AI and automation projects where connecting different web services can otherwise take significant development time. TinyFish reduces the amount of repetitive browser work and makes it easier to prototype practical AI agents that can operate on the web.

It also opens up use cases that would be difficult to automate through traditional APIs alone, allowing me to focus more on the product logic and user experience rather than maintaining custom integrations for every website. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.