![Jayesh W.](/assets/transparent-ad5be28fbcd25b7b08d2cebe1d957125437fb5407d75ee717965ad22c8808791.gif "Jayesh W.")
JW

Jayesh W.

Software Engineer II

Computer Software

Enterprise (\> 1000 emp.)

8/18/2026

"Structured Incident Triage and Engineering Workflow Automation"

4/5

What do you like best about Tines?

The visual workflow structure makes complex incident logic much easier to follow. I particularly like how alert ingestion, field normalization, severity classification, rider-experience stage identification, engineering routing, and investigation tracking can be kept as separate steps while still forming one workflow. The detailed outputs also make it easier to understand why an incident was classified and where it should go next. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What do you dislike about Tines?

The workflow can become harder to navigate once there are many stages and detailed conditions. Keeping the logic and outputs organized takes some discipline, especially when the incident flow becomes more complex. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

What problems is Tines solving and how is that benefiting you?

Tines helps structure incident triage that would otherwise require several manual handoffs. The workflow standardizes alert intake, normalizes incident fields, evaluates severity, identifies the affected rider-experience stage, and routes the investigation to the appropriate engineering area. This makes the triage process more consistent and gives the team a clearer incident record and next steps. Review collected by and hosted on G2.com.

Show More

Current UserValidated ReviewerIncentivizedSource: G2 invite

See what 409 reviewers think of Tines

4.7 out of 5 · Verified reviews from real users

[
Read all reviews
](https://www.g2.com/products/tines/reviews)